Tim Smith....

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
the-Bowtun-Warrior
Posts: 2815
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 6:13 pm

Re: Tim Smith....

Post by the-Bowtun-Warrior »

i'm not Smith's biggest fan. i do think he COULD have a place at wigan though....



but,
isn't it funny. we never (i never read or heard) critisised TS for his defence before that home game at the beginning of the year where he hung onto a try scorers shirt.

now all of a sudden, he's a worse tackler than every man in SL!
Owen Coyles Super White Army!!!


gpartin
Posts: 4706
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:37 pm

Re: Tim Smith....

Post by gpartin »

the-Bowtun-Warr ior wrote:i'm not Smith's biggest fan. i do think he COULD have a place at wigan though....



but,
isn't it funny. we never (i never read or heard) critisised TS for his defence before that home game at the beginning of the year where he hung onto a try scorers shirt.

now all of a sudden, he's a worse tackler than every man in SL!
Good point, and he was also the closest thing we had to a decent player in the Hull game having made some great passes and kick to the corner IIRC.
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."


ashtonned
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:47 pm

Re: Tim Smith....

Post by ashtonned »

the-Bowtun-Warr ior wrote:i'm not Smith's biggest fan. i do think he COULD have a place at wigan though....



but,
isn't it funny. we never (i never read or heard) critisised TS for his defence before that home game at the beginning of the year where he hung onto a try scorers shirt.

now all of a sudden, he's a worse tackler than every man in SL!
I think you will find that plenty of people have critised his defense ever since he came to the club. If you were referring to the Cas game then he was at fault for at least 3 tries. His performance in this game was one, if not the, the worst that I have ever seen from a rugby player, at any level. The week later against Quins he was that bad again that Noble brought him off and didnt put him back on. He was then dropped for a few games. It is very debatable if he has even done anything in the reserves to even earn a recall after being dropped.
the-Bowtun-Warrior
Posts: 2815
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 6:13 pm

Re: Tim Smith....

Post by the-Bowtun-Warrior »

gpartin wrote:
the-Bowtun-Warr ior wrote:i'm not Smith's biggest fan. i do think he COULD have a place at wigan though....



but,
isn't it funny. we never (i never read or heard) critisised TS for his defence before that home game at the beginning of the year where he hung onto a try scorers shirt.

now all of a sudden, he's a worse tackler than every man in SL!
Good point, and he was also the closest thing we had to a decent player in the Hull game having made some great passes and kick to the corner IIRC.
personally i like him with ball in hand. i dont think there are any doubts as to his talent. his assist ratio this season speaks for itself.

i just think many are fickle and jump on this 'defence' bandwaggon!

Owen Coyles Super White Army!!!


cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Tim Smith....

Post by cpwigan »

He is limited with ball in hand to passing. He is not fit enough nor fast enough to pose a running threat. His kicking game which was once upon a time great is very hit and miss due to lack of strength/fitness.

Irrespective we are going to have to play him presumably with Piggy out for a few weeks.
the-Bowtun-Warrior
Posts: 2815
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 6:13 pm

Re: Tim Smith....

Post by the-Bowtun-Warrior »

cpwigan wrote:He is limited with ball in hand to passing. He is not fit enough nor fast enough to pose a running threat. His kicking game which was once upon a time great is very hit and miss due to lack of strength/fitness.

Irrespective we are going to have to play him presumably with Piggy out for a few weeks.

limited ball in hand?

brilliant...
Owen Coyles Super White Army!!!


mike binder
Posts: 9763
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 6:17 pm

Re: Tim Smith....

Post by mike binder »

hal;f backs should not defens ,he shaould ahve a good centre and second row at the side of him when defending to cover him ,i now feel he has that
mikebinderflooring@yahoo.co.uk for all your carpets and vinyls suppiled and fitted


TROPHIES COMING HOME
IT COMING HOME
ITS COMING HOME
ITS COMING
TROPHIES COMING HOME
ancientnloyal
Posts: 14533
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:33 pm
Location: Howe Bridge
Contact:

Re: Tim Smith....

Post by ancientnloyal »

mike binder wrote:hal;f backs should not defens ,he shaould ahve a good centre and second row at the side of him when defending to cover him ,i now feel he has that
OLoughlin/Gleeson
Hock/Hansen - Phelps/Carmont

I see your point depending on where Smith drops in the defensive line Gleeson seems to have tightened up what you've said.

Imagine KP in there?
https://www.ancientandloyal.com/

Now on Bluesky Social Media posting regularly pre-War snippets
https://bsky.app/profile/ancientandloyal.com
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Tim Smith....

Post by cpwigan »

the-Bowtun-Warr ior wrote:
cpwigan wrote:He is limited with ball in hand to passing. He is not fit enough nor fast enough to pose a running threat. His kicking game which was once upon a time great is very hit and miss due to lack of strength/fitness.

Irrespective we are going to have to play him presumably with Piggy out for a few weeks.

limited ball in hand?

brilliant...
?
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Tim Smith....

Post by cpwigan »

mike binder wrote:hal;f backs should not defens ,he shaould ahve a good centre and second row at the side of him when defending to cover him ,i now feel he has that
Every player has to be able to defend in Modern RL Mike. You cannot hide at the highest level. A decent team will simply run plays that isolate a weak defender especially near the line.
Post Reply