If Pryce is away who is

highland convert · Post by **highland convert** » Sun May 24, 2009 10:48 am

Who are we sponsering if he is out on loan? Missed any reference to him for a while. Jim

GeoffN · Post by **GeoffN** » Sun May 24, 2009 11:27 am

highland convert wrote:Who are we sponsering if he is out on loan? Missed any reference to him for a while. Jim

Was rumoured (a month ago) to be going to Leigh on loan, but he played last week for our reserves against HKR (not sure if he played yesterday against Wire).

ancientnloyal · Post by **ancientnloyal** » Sun May 24, 2009 8:51 pm

I think, if we as a group of members on here, decide to continue sponsoring a player we'd need to go for a new signing, academy player or see who of the current players aren't renewed.

Anyone think Pryce was a mistake?

trotski_tgwu · Post by **trotski_tgwu** » Sun May 24, 2009 8:54 pm

ancientnloyal wrote:I think, if we as a group of members on here, decide to continue sponsoring a player we'd need to go for a new signing, academy player or see who of the current players aren't renewed.

Anyone think Pryce was a mistake?

think we bought a Pig In a Pock
If we Ever Sponser a Player again we def need to sponsor one who PLAYS

Warrior10 · Post by **Warrior10** » Sun May 24, 2009 9:00 pm

GeoffN wrote:
highland convert wrote:Who are we sponsering if he is out on loan? Missed any reference to him for a while. Jim
Was rumoured (a month ago) to be going to Leigh on loan, but he played last week for our reserves against HKR (not sure if he played yesterday against Wire).

Pryce played yesterday at 6 for the reserves at wilderspool, had quite a good game, can kick high bombs up on last tackle, low grubbers and beltin defence, just doenst seem to play like that in 1st team, seems lazy

ancientnloyal · Post by **ancientnloyal** » Sun May 24, 2009 9:03 pm

I suppose the view given at the time was that he has a good record from Bradford and he would be fully fit, those were the signs coming from Winter. He's a big lad so expect power and pace etc... Â£499 seemed a good one for a player we'd thought we'd see most weeks.

GARETH HOCK WAS AVAILABLE FOR A WHILE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IMO, nothing against Pryce but I put Â£25 in for the aid of this website on the big screen and the programme. He's been up on the board once as a scorer (bradford?) and we havent seen him since.

Hopefully we'll get to see more of him when injuries spring up.

trotski_tgwu · Post by **trotski_tgwu** » Sun May 24, 2009 9:55 pm

ancientnloyal wrote:I suppose the view given at the time was that he has a good record from Bradford and he would be fully fit, those were the signs coming from Winter. He's a big lad so expect power and pace etc... Â£499 seemed a good one for a player we'd thought we'd see most weeks.

GARETH HOCK WAS AVAILABLE FOR A WHILE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IMO, nothing against Pryce but I put Â£25 in for the aid of this website on the big screen and the programme. He's been up on the board once as a scorer (bradford?) and we havent seen him since.

Hopefully we'll get to see more of him when injuries spring up.

Wish we had bought Hock instead

cpwigan · Post by **cpwigan** » Sun May 24, 2009 10:37 pm

He was a good idea at the time but hindsight says otherwise. We could not afford Hock at 1K.

mike binder · Post by **mike binder** » Mon May 25, 2009 12:37 pm

i have no probs sponsr=ing him ,yes maybe next season a up and coming youngster ,Josie and cpwigan watch on a regular basis ,maybe they can oick Mark Flannagan still as no sponsor this season as dosnt Farrell

cpwigan · Post by **cpwigan** » Mon May 25, 2009 12:46 pm

I would echo the lesson learn re what Mike says. I would rather sponsor a young player personally.

If Pryce is away who is

If Pryce is away who is

Re: If Pryce is away who is

Re: If Pryce is away who is

Re: If Pryce is away who is

Re: If Pryce is away who is

Re: If Pryce is away who is

Re: If Pryce is away who is

Re: If Pryce is away who is

Re: If Pryce is away who is

Re: If Pryce is away who is