Gareth Hock

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
FROM A TO B
Posts: 5038
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Gareth Hock

Post by FROM A TO B »

joeb wrote:Slightly amusing but potentially libelous comment
Careful, talk like that could land you or this site in trouble
Warrior came
Warrior saw
Warrior conquered
Warrior came
Warrior saw
Warrior conquered
gpartin
Posts: 4706
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:37 pm

Re: Gareth Hock

Post by gpartin »

Keep it on Gaz Hock please, the last thing we want is to put the future of the site in jeopardy by naming names and making unproven suggestions, funny, obvious or otherwise.
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."


weststand-rich
Posts: 1120
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:35 am

Re: Gareth Hock

Post by weststand-rich »

This is how daft he is.

On match day tests the anti-doping testers test for all substances including cocaine where there may be some stimulant effects within the match period. However on none matchdays, the doping tests don't test for cocaine, because the test is reasonably expensive and there would be no performance enhancement on none-matchdays.

So all you have to do if you want to play rugby and not get tested positive is avoid cocaine for the 2 day window prior to playing any match. And GH couldn't even manage that!
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Gareth Hock

Post by cpwigan »

Just to add Do not expect any announcement re the B sample in the next day or so. The testers test every sport and Hock's B sample will get done when it gets done which means Friday at best, maybe next week.
User avatar
Fujiman
Posts: 3168
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 1:19 pm

Re: Gareth Hock

Post by Fujiman »

cpwigan wrote:Just to add Do not expect any announcement re the B sample in the next day or so. The testers test every sport and Hock's B sample will get done when it gets done which means Friday at best, maybe next week.
But would it not get priority?
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Gareth Hock

Post by cpwigan »

No Fuji. However odd it seems. I think they add a few more parts too the test also which adds to the time it takes.

With a bit of luck Friday at the best is the current message.
User avatar
south_stander
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:44 pm

Re: Gareth Hock

Post by south_stander »

Hopefully by the time they test it the banned substance mite have miraculously disappeared lol!! :lol:
fred_flintstone
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 4:58 pm

Re: Gareth Hock

Post by fred_flintstone »

OK, there's seems to be much speculation on how these tests are carried out so I just spent a good hour of my life, which I'll never get back, reading the UK Sports drugs policy. To cut a very long and dull story short this gives the best overall view:

'When called for a drugs test the athlete is entitled to have a representative (such as their coach or team doctor) present to verify that the testing occurred in accordance to guidelines. A sample is provided (in view of an official of the same gender) and split into two bottles and sealed by the athlete. A code number will be attached to the bottle and recorded on the relevant paperwork to ensure the correct result is given to the athlete whilst retaining their anonymity.

Following the sampling procedure the athlete must complete a medical declaration which states all medicines, drugs and substances taken over the last week. It is important that the athlete records everything, from over-the-counter medicines, to supplements and prescribed drugs. If any of these substances are on the prohibited list the athlete must hold a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE). The competitor, representative and official all check the form before the official and athlete sign it and both parties are given a copy.

The samples are then sent to a registered laboratory (if there is not one on site) where sample A is tested using gas chromatography (which uses separation techniques to divide the contents of the sample) and mass spectrometry (which provides the exact molecular specification of the compounds). If a positive result is found with sample A, the athlete is notified before sample B is also tested. The athlete or their representative is entitled to be present at the unsealing and testing of the second sample. If this too is positive, the relevant sporting organisations are notified whose responsibility it is to decide what penalties or bans are to be imposed'.

So children, that's how it's done. Everyday is a school day!

Post Reply