Consistency of officials language terminology

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Consistency of officials language terminology

Post by cpwigan »

First and foremost when a player is seemingly tackle/not tackled it always creates confusion. Phil Gould has long argued the referee should tell the player to go back to the mark even when he has tried to move off it unaware that the referee thinks the tackle has been completed.

Joel Tomkins. Ben Thaler clearly thought he was held but to shout get up and play the ball is IMO a really poor choice of language. HELD is a single word and all players know what it means. You could even shout TACKLE(D) and for me if the tackle is not complete PLAY ON.

Next 6 Saints scored. Is a penalty for this mistake too harsh. At worst a scrum to the defending team?
User avatar
Red Hot Mama
Posts: 402
Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 2:04 pm

Re: Consistency of officials language terminology

Post by Red Hot Mama »

Being able to count to six may also be considered a prerequisite for refs as well. Mr Thaler seemed to struggle with 4 and 5 last night.
Brian's Girl


Panchitta Marra
Posts: 6134
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: Consistency of officials language terminology

Post by Panchitta Marra »

cpwigan wrote:First and foremost when a player is seemingly tackle/not tackled it always creates confusion. Phil Gould has long argued the referee should tell the player to go back to the mark even when he has tried to move off it unaware that the referee thinks the tackle has been completed.

Joel Tomkins. Ben Thaler clearly thought he was held but to shout get up and play the ball is IMO a really poor choice of language. HELD is a single word and all players know what it means. You could even shout TACKLE(D) and for me if the tackle is not complete PLAY ON.

Next 6 Saints scored. Is a penalty for this mistake too harsh. At worst a scrum to the defending team?
All comments made by referees, types of decisions judged must be more standardised. It must also be standardised with levelparity between Southern & Nothern Hemisphere games.
I cant understand why Superleague, NRL & ARL dont have a joint a major conference(s) prior to the respective seasons started where all clubs representatives, referees and heads of the sport attend, to make sure all is clear without doubt, and on a level playing field.
Once the standards have been set, referees can then be judged on clarity of their decisions and comments made throughout the game.
As Northern Hemisphere, we are falling behind again to a sport with two referees which has a faster more effective play the ball for starters.
User avatar
ian b
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:50 pm

Re: Consistency of officials language terminology

Post by ian b »

cpwigan wrote:First and foremost when a player is seemingly tackle/not tackled it always creates confusion. Phil Gould has long argued the referee should tell the player to go back to the mark even when he has tried to move off it unaware that the referee thinks the tackle has been completed.

Joel Tomkins. Ben Thaler clearly thought he was held but to shout get up and play the ball is IMO a really poor choice of language. HELD is a single word and all players know what it means. You could even shout TACKLE(D) and for me if the tackle is not complete PLAY ON.

Next 6 Saints scored. Is a penalty for this mistake too harsh. At worst a scrum to the defending team?
i agree j tomkins looked genuine and wasnt trying to pinch yards,Thaler is an arse who struggles counting :D
User avatar
Wigan_forever1985
Posts: 6594
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm

Re: Consistency of officials language terminology

Post by Wigan_forever1985 »

I had this rant after the match what ever happened to HELD, NOT HELD!, 2 clear and concise calls. Also if its difficult to hear them which it may be why not a clear gesture like ref holds his arm straight in the air holding out however many fingers to denote the tackle count
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
turf
Posts: 5539
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:53 pm

Re: Consistency of officials language terminology

Post by turf »

On the replay though when he allegedly got mixed up with tackle 4 and 5, he seemed to say, that's 4, it's 4.
User avatar
Mike
Site Admin
Posts: 7537
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 6:54 pm
Contact:

Re: Consistency of officials language terminology

Post by Mike »

I've been banging on about this for ages. Its simple to fix. Why aren't referees controlled by someone intelligent?
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
🏆🏆🏆🏆
turf
Posts: 5539
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:53 pm

Re: Consistency of officials language terminology

Post by turf »

I think Thaler also rightly penalised J Tomkins, because he said, "get up and play the ball, play it, play it" and even quickly with his hand gestured for him to get up and quickly with his foot to play the ball.

J Tomkins got totally confused as to what Mr Thaler wanted so he carried on and gets penalised.
Spanakopitta
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 10:03 am

Re: Consistency of officials language terminology

Post by Spanakopitta »

yes but the first words you hear are - GET UP

this could be followed by PLAY IT or by PLAY ON.

at least by shouting HELD there is no confusion.

PS Thaler must have a yorkshire tape measure, it seemed a few metres short to me!
GEER EM ONSIDE
Big Steve
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:21 pm

Re: Consistency of officials language terminology

Post by Big Steve »

Shouting PLAY ..... could either be play on or play the ball.

Shouting HELD it's obvious that the tackle has been made.

Waving your hands in the air to seemingly indicate 'get up' could easily be taken as 'get up and play the ball' or get up and carry on'. As far as I know, an encouraging wave of your hand isn't a standard sign for play the ball is it?

Why award a pen for an obvious mistake/confusion when there are far more serious (and advantageous to the offending team) things that should be penalised.
Post Reply