Consistency of officials language terminology
- Wigan_forever1985
- Posts: 6673
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm
Re: Consistency of officials language terminology
My Favourite call is "MOVE", what good does that bloody do?, who should move?, attacker move?, defender move?, one of my gripes aswell is when ref's say "leave him!" to defenders when the attacker is still pushing forward.
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
Re: Consistency of officials language terminology
Correct. For a situation where it's just confusion, as that was, he should just be made to move back and play it. A penalty should only be when the player deliberately moves forward.Big Steve wrote:Shouting PLAY ..... could either be play on or play the ball.
Shouting HELD it's obvious that the tackle has been made.
Waving your hands in the air to seemingly indicate 'get up' could easily be taken as 'get up and play the ball' or get up and carry on'. As far as I know, an encouraging wave of your hand isn't a standard sign for play the ball is it?
Why award a pen for an obvious mistake/confusion when there are far more serious (and advantageous to the offending team) things that should be penalised.
Re: Consistency of officials language terminology
i pity young Turf having to mix with that lotGeoffN wrote:Correct. For a situation where it's just confusion, as that was, he should just be made to move back and play it. A penalty should only be when the player deliberately moves forward.Big Steve wrote:Shouting PLAY ..... could either be play on or play the ball.
Shouting HELD it's obvious that the tackle has been made.
Waving your hands in the air to seemingly indicate 'get up' could easily be taken as 'get up and play the ball' or get up and carry on'. As far as I know, an encouraging wave of your hand isn't a standard sign for play the ball is it?
Why award a pen for an obvious mistake/confusion when there are far more serious (and advantageous to the offending team) things that should be penalised.
Wigan is and always will be a town of Cherry & White
Re: Consistency of officials language terminology
Especially Mr Thaler, who seems to be OFF form at the moment.
Maybe that is why he is only Reserve Referee on Sunday in the Saints game?
Maybe Cummings HAS looked reviewed his performance last Friday night and said, "you're dropped to reserve referee this Weekend Ben".
Maybe that is why he is only Reserve Referee on Sunday in the Saints game?
Maybe Cummings HAS looked reviewed his performance last Friday night and said, "you're dropped to reserve referee this Weekend Ben".
-
- Posts: 11308
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm
Re: Consistency of officials language terminology
You just said on another thread that you liked him!turf wrote:Especially Mr Thaler, who seems to be OFF form at the moment.
Perhaps this is an indication of the consistency we can expect from you in the coming season!!


Re: Consistency of officials language terminology
If i was honest about the refereeing standards these days since they beacame fulltime professionals ( i laugh with derision)
I do not think the standards of referring have advanced any in over 40 odd years i have been watching our great game
Referees make mistakes just as we all do from time to time
But referees make more of them
I do not think the standards of referring have advanced any in over 40 odd years i have been watching our great game
Referees make mistakes just as we all do from time to time
But referees make more of them
Wigan is and always will be a town of Cherry & White
Re: Consistency of officials language terminology
I said that I LIKED the Ben "Stevie Wonder Thaler comment by you.Kittwazzer wrote:You just said on another thread that you liked him!turf wrote:Especially Mr Thaler, who seems to be OFF form at the moment.
Perhaps this is an indication of the consistency we can expect from you in the coming season!!![]()
![]()