James Graham v Mick Potter

Got a hot rumour from a source inside the club, or just something you heard down the pub? Then what are you waiting for, post it on The Rumour Mill.
slimshady
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:04 am

James Graham v Mick Potter

Post by slimshady »

Heard a whisper that James Graham punched Mick Potter last week and that is the reason he didnt play at weekend, not injured as the club said. Been told he is on his way out and possibly going to Warrington.
pedro
Posts: 5294
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:37 pm

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Post by pedro »

No way on this earth could Wire afford him.

Is the reason Bibey left Wigan as he bench pressed Raper in a club :D
thomo
Posts: 486
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:02 pm

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Post by thomo »

would have him here like a shot - small contract next year then big money the following year to replace Fielden

Bet this is just pub talk about Graham & Potter - my mate knows the groundsman's cousins dog walker
Panchitta Marra
Posts: 6134
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Post by Panchitta Marra »

Is Graham's shoulder still not iffy from the Buchanan tackle last week.
Surely that's why he was not selected to play against Les cats.
User avatar
MrDave
Posts: 1479
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:29 pm

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Post by MrDave »

Graham had been training all week but was told he would have to wait till a day before the match for a final assessment as to whether he could play in the match but was told not to bother as he wouldn't be playing anyway.

On one hand you could say that Potter didn't want to risk Graham at all or you could say there is another reason behind it.

There have been a lot of rumours that Graham and a few other have not been getting on well with Potter.

I heard the other day that Graham could go to Hull KR or Huddersfield and then Wigan were going to trade a player + cash for Graham, a bit like the Higham transfer a few season ago but more wishful thinking than an a rumour really.
Panchitta Marra
Posts: 6134
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Post by Panchitta Marra »

MrDave wrote:Graham had been training all week but was told he would have to wait till a day before the match for a final assessment as to whether he could play in the match but was told not to bother as he wouldn't be playing anyway.

On one hand you could say that Potter didn't want to risk Graham at all or you could say there is another reason behind it.

There have been a lot of rumours that Graham and a few other have not been getting on well with Potter.

I heard the other day that Graham could go to Hull KR or Huddersfield and then Wigan were going to trade a player + cash for Graham, a bit like the Higham transfer a few season ago but more wishful thinking than an a rumour really.
This is a must do signing if the lad does become availble.
Whether he would choose Wigan after playing from a kid at Stains is a different matter.
User avatar
right cross
Posts: 747
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:57 am

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Post by right cross »

ive heard cunningham had a bust up with potter and they don't speak :)
outback wiganer
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:45 pm

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Post by outback wiganer »

Personally I would love to punch both of them. James Graham because he is so arrogant, and Mick Potter just to knock some personality into him.
User avatar
ian b
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:50 pm

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Post by ian b »

pedro wrote:No way on this earth could Wire afford him.

Is the reason Bibey left Wigan as he bench pressed Raper in a club :D
wire can buy anyone they want and still be under the cap :conf:
centralparkforever
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:11 pm

Re: James Graham v Mick Potter

Post by centralparkforever »

Been told he has signed for us next season,Saints are skint and a big transfer fee has been agreed.
Post Reply