Bentham factor

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
NathanCroucher
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 3:26 pm

Re: Bentham factor

Post by NathanCroucher »

Yes he would have only been 3 years old but I need to start my conspiracy theories somewhere haha.
Lovers Come & Go But I Will Always Have My Wigan Rugby.
mozz
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:01 am

Re: Bentham factor

Post by mozz »

:angry: he makes me mad by not giveing a drop out when the st helens player went over the dead ball line and he left a foot mark and he just said play on
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Bentham factor

Post by cpwigan »

Awful mistake whilst wellens clearly ripped the ball out towards the end but we had to drop out.
NathanCroucher
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 3:26 pm

Re: Bentham factor

Post by NathanCroucher »

That moment really riled me up but that was more the touch judges fault. I also made a mistake with my grammar in an earlier post, I do apologise.
Lovers Come & Go But I Will Always Have My Wigan Rugby.
mozz
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:01 am

Re: Bentham factor

Post by mozz »

howz about when that st helens player got that try in the coner but his hands where not no the ball :exc: :angry:
mozz
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:01 am

Re: Bentham factor

Post by mozz »

rugby league needs better refs not just because of r matchs because stuff like that happens in every match that is played. :exc:
botica
Posts: 712
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 5:07 pm

Re: Bentham factor

Post by botica »

I've re-watched the game and no way was Meli's try a try, Downward pressure WHERE?? The ball was still sitting on end!! Cunningham was a thug today and nothing done at all, and how many times can Tommy be taken out like that before he suffers some injury.

He is just so inconsistant it was unbelieveable. The disent from Graham.... We were awarded the penelty OK but that was for the infirngement, They should have been marched back a further 10 as well, Foster taking the ball behind the dead ball, NOT SEEN...
"Not only did they beat St Helens in the Grand Final, they did it with style" Mike Stephenson 2nd Oct 2010
highland convert
Posts: 2526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:44 pm

Re: Bentham factor

Post by highland convert »

What about carmont's try? I watched it a few times and it did seem he had the ball down before he touched down. He ws adamant he had but B would not put it to the video ref!!!!
Jim
LORENZO
Posts: 412
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:26 am

Re: Bentham factor

Post by LORENZO »

When Ian Millward on the radio is saying that Saints had some lucky breaks from the ref.........beggars belief.
Matthew
Posts: 3273
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 2:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Bentham factor

Post by Matthew »

Thought that Thaler was worse than Bent-ham today. The Meli "try" and when Roby was held up over the line; both decision's were disgraceful.

Bent-ham wasn't as bad as he has been previously this season; but he's still not up to standard. He made too many poor decisions; missed too many infringements and let stains lie on far longer than he did us. If you watch the game again; he says "go" to release the defensive line before the Wigan player places the ball on the ground; giving stains half a second to close the gap. He also let Pryce do a swan dive.

Cunningham was twice penalised for foul play - throwing a punch McIlorum and the cheap shot on Tommy - why wasn't he sent to the bin? You can bet that if Bailey had done that he would have been!
"And Martin Offiah, trying to make some space, now then..." - Ray French, Wembley 1994
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?

Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
Post Reply