RFL take the P

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

RFL take the P

Post by cpwigan »

Matthew
Posts: 3273
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 2:40 pm
Contact:

Re: RFL take the P

Post by Matthew »

So having a go at someone who has blatantly committed a professional foul and thereby prevented a team from scoring a match winning try is fine - but if you have a go at him for doing it then you have to be reviewed?

This is purely down to uncle fester whining to his mates in the post match interview - gutless
"And Martin Offiah, trying to make some space, now then..." - Ray French, Wembley 1994
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?

Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
shaunedwardsfanclub
Posts: 6338
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: RFL take the P

Post by shaunedwardsfanclub »

Let's see what happens to Buderus. I bet he gets a warning and fine, then again he might get the freedom of Red Hall!
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
pies,pies,pies
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 10:28 pm

Re: RFL take the P

Post by pies,pies,pies »

just glad joel got off with a caution cos he should of walked. if ryan bailey had done that i think the crowd may of wanted his blood :o :o :o
ste lord
Posts: 1128
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 8:12 pm

Re: RFL take the P

Post by ste lord »

the player they have picked out from the photo is piggy but they have put tommy as the player in question !!!!


Keep Wigan "Wigan"




pedro
Posts: 5297
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:37 pm

Re: RFL take the P

Post by pedro »

JJ wrote:Danny Buderus charged
Incident considered Dangerous throw in 30th minute (Prescott)
Decision Charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Law: 15.1(d) Detail: Dangerous throw Grade: A


Danny Mcguire not even cited :conf:
professional foul isnt bannable is it? Its not serious foul play
Kittwazzer
Posts: 11308
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm

Re: RFL take the P

Post by Kittwazzer »

Correct. Professional foul is an automatic Sending Off. THEN it becomes bannable. But at that point, Alibert was trying to remember if he needed to call at Aldi before he set off for home!
botica
Posts: 712
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 5:07 pm

Re: RFL take the P

Post by botica »

ste lord wrote:
the player they have picked out from the photo is piggy but they have put tommy as the player in question !!!!
I don't think they looked.... They listened to McClennan. If they had looked they would see a number 9 clearly on his back whilst he told the cheeting scum bag his parents were not married...
"Not only did they beat St Helens in the Grand Final, they did it with style" Mike Stephenson 2nd Oct 2010
User avatar
bourbon_rat
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:47 am
Contact:

Re: RFL take the P

Post by bourbon_rat »

JJ wrote:Danny Mcguire not even cited :conf:
Mcquire 'cited' by a higher power :cool:
McGUIRE IN OP BLOW
Always carry a flagon of whiskey in case of snakebite
and furthermore always carry a small snake
- W C Fields
markill
Posts: 3675
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:50 pm
Contact:

Re: RFL take the P

Post by markill »

Well given the serious nature of his injury and the fact that one of our players clearly took him out in back play I'm very surprised no one is before the panel for it. :roll: :wink:
in the world of mules, there are no rules

LATEST PODCAST EPISODE
https://www.spreaker.com/user/superleaguepod
Post Reply