England v Aus teams
Re: England v Aus teams
they have had 3 tries awarded that are a joke and Atkins is utter shite
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 2:41 pm
Re: England v Aus teams
Ah well same old same old bring on PNG lol
Re: England v Aus teams
Strange game although conditions did not help. Maybe fans will stop using the old red herring that wet conditions suit us. Probably the weakest centre/wings for Aus in a long time but we never get the opportunity to test them enough. Excellent Aus kicking game.
Aus are obviously better than England BUT strewth they do not need a helping hand from officials who are either incompetent or corrupt. When a referee has a line to help him see a forward pass and still says play on you start thinking the latter.
McNamara is out of his depth even more than the players.
Aus are obviously better than England BUT strewth they do not need a helping hand from officials who are either incompetent or corrupt. When a referee has a line to help him see a forward pass and still says play on you start thinking the latter.
McNamara is out of his depth even more than the players.
-
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:54 am
Re: England v Aus teams
Phil Gould and others always go on about the wet weather suiting the English because they are used to it, thats the biggest myth in the game.
-
- Posts: 38439
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Re: England v Aus teams
TotallyTWO EYED WARRIOR wrote:I have to say the whole tournament is slowly becoming a joke

For me too!England for me should be GB team.
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
Re: England v Aus teams
Here Hereian b wrote:they have had 3 tries awarded that are a joke and Atkins is utter shite
Atkins is a joke. Worst defensive centre I've seen in many a year.
-
- Posts: 472
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:49 am
Re: England v Aus teams
can anyone explain to me, perhaps someone who watches nrl regularly, why the video refs have benefit of the doubt AND refs call available to them?
He gave benifit of the doubt on the second lewis try, but when sean lunt went close, he gave a refs call. seems illogical to me to have two different decisions when the video ref decides that the video evidence isn't conclusive.
He gave benifit of the doubt on the second lewis try, but when sean lunt went close, he gave a refs call. seems illogical to me to have two different decisions when the video ref decides that the video evidence isn't conclusive.