NOT GOOD ENOUGH

[mike binder]

we_need_a_coach posted:
Just balme Betts and Doris, this is becoming a disaster !!!!

tell u wat lets just blame u??????

[mike binder]

mrs_carney posted:
I'm not saying just look at the scoreline, but a draw today would have been fair for both teams, we both played well, but i just thought today wigan played exceptionally better than they have been doing! I'm just objecting to the fact he listened to it on the radio and said it sounded like we played crap, when we played really well!

:eusa2: here here

[davewarrior]

I agree we are not up to it. When with the scores level and a penalty almost in front of the sticks, it looked like a comedy show with all the team appealing to the dug out (or where they looking for Faz) to give them the instructions what to do.

[robjoenz]

davewarrior posted:
I agree we are not up to it. When with the scores level and a penalty almost in front of the sticks, it looked like a comedy show with all the team appealing to the dug out (or where they looking for Faz) to give them the instructions what to do.

I think you'll find they were asking for the kicking tee to be brought onto the pitch mate.

[the grinch]

i think a middle of the road post would be wise as i dont want to be ripped to bits by mrs lam!!!! wigan are improving the performance was a lot better than it has been for quite a few games. but i would rather play awful and win than great and lose! we will be dragged into a religation fight if we carry on as we are. wigan cannot afford to do nothing and hope we start winning soon.

[primrose-n-blue]

You might of played well, but we played very poorly at times and still beat you.

:doz: denis
:with: Mo

[we_need_a_coach]

primrose-n-blue posted:
You might of played well, but we played very poorly at times and still beat you.

:doz: denis
:with: Mo

This is the point I was trying to make on another thread. Yes we played better, but Warrington, played poorly today, if briers had been playing, and they had played as in previous matches, we would have been slaughteres again.
We can't keep turning up, and just hoping the opposing team has an off day !!

Action is needed NOW !!!!

WE_NEED_A_COACH

[DaveO]

we_need_a_coach posted:

primrose-n-blue posted:
You might of played well, but we played very poorly at times and still beat you.

:doz: denis
:with: Mo

This is the point I was trying to make on another thread. Yes we played better, but Warrington, played poorly today, if briers had been playing, and they had played as in previous matches, we would have been slaughteres again.
We can't keep turning up, and just hoping the opposing team has an off day !!

Action is needed NOW !!!!

WE_NEED_A_COACH

Saying they would have slaughterd us with Briers is a bit like saying we would have walked all over them had Rads, Hock and O'Loughlin been in the Wigan side.

You have no idea how things would have panned out with different personell available to either side.

You can only play the team you have and the team the opposition puts out. If Wire were poor without Briers then they aren't much of a team and old primrose is getting carried away.

Dave

[mackie]

look at the games we have lost this year

hudd away
london away
wakey away
leeds home
bulls home/away
wire away

forget how we played only 2 of these games should have been lost wigan should NOT be loosing to the likes of wakey, hudds, london and wire. We need to sort something out and quick or forget the playoffs we will be going down. I ahte to say it but betts has to go. Personally i would rather have anderson than millward but think the latter is more likely

[robjoenz]

Doug Stand posted:
Do the management team know why we are losing. Is it fitness? Is it skill level? is it commitment? or something else?

You neglected the actual reason... we are missing a few players to injury, we've lost our captain and even if we'd had all our players fit we'd have a weaker squad than last season. Squad building, or lack of, is to blame. It's about time the Chairman let Betts pick the team then we can properly judge him.