Where have I ever attacked Wane on a personal level? I confine myself to debating his tactics and selections etc and do not resort to personal attacks.devon jim 1 wrote:I think the same Whelley Warrior; DaveO's remarks on Wane do seem personal.
I have plenty to say about his coaching as I did Noble's and given debating such things is what this site is for I have no idea what the problem is.
"finally I'll add his ubiquitous use of IMO" The use of IMO is an attempt on my part to address the accusation that I write as if I am stating facts rather than opinions.Dave should take his own advice and change his record. We all know of his adoration for Madge and his feelings towards Wane. Give it a rest it detracts from his obvious knowledge of our game which I for one value finally I'll add his ubiquitous use of IMO......(no offence intended) I also agree with his comments on the 1985 2013 post. I was there to and my man of the match was Peter Sterling
![]()
BTW, IMO comes from Usenet (as does BTW!) where it's considered good etiquette to use IMO so it doesn't look as if your written words are stating facts rather than opinion.
Here's a list for you:
http://www.allacronyms.com/tag/usenet
AFAIC using IMO ought not to be needed as debate about Wane's coaching ability or anything else on here is all opinion but some people seem to want reminding posts really are just opinion and nothing else, hence the use of IMO.