So who's to blame this year?

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
xbrettkennyx
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 6:13 pm

Re: So who's to blame this year?

Post by xbrettkennyx »

DaveO wrote:
ancientnloyal wrote:
xbrettkennyx wrote:IL is a fair shout tbh.

He want's to "play at chairman" on the cheap.

He is relying on the standard of SL slipping in order to justify his lack of investment.

Even if Wigan RL win the double again, it's necessarily a good thing for the game.


Not a dig, more an observation.
Didn't he vote for the marquee player? That's a bit of investment in itself.
It is not consistent with voting against a rise in the salary cap. He was even interviewed and said "Why would we increase the salary cap?" (or words to that effect) with a bit of an incredulous look on his face.

I think he needs to make his mind up because he is being inconsistent. Does he see the need to pay the players more or not?
Correct.

So he was being at best naive, at worst put his own interests over that of the club/game, or in the middle accepting the inevitable conclusion that the game is headed towards semi pro status and he is fine with it.

nellywelly
Posts: 270
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 10:38 am

Re: So who's to blame this year?

Post by nellywelly »

IL is staying on the fence and he knows if the salary cap was raised he would lose players not only to the Ausy league but to Superleague clubs as well.His policy of replacing our top players with young players is to keep the wage bill down, not to win cups. This season we will struggle but I think we will be there about perhaps 5th or 6th
Kaii
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:43 pm

Re: So who's to blame this year?

Post by Kaii »

nellywelly wrote:IL is staying on the fence and he knows if the salary cap was raised he would lose players not only to the Ausy league but to Superleague clubs as well.His policy of replacing our top players with young players is to keep the wage bill down, not to win cups. This season we will struggle but I think we will be there about perhaps 5th or 6th
How the hell did you work that out, we can pay more but will lose more players to not only the NRL but Superleague clubs. Our cap doesn't effect the NRL's and it would be equal to other SL clubs. A rise doesn't effect that what so ever, also how is it IL's policy to replace top players with young one. He didn't want to sell Sam, Lee, H or Pat they decided to leave themselves for different reasons.

This is even before you take in to account that Shaun Wane decides who plays for him not IL
josie andrews
Posts: 36240
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: So who's to blame this year?

Post by josie andrews »

nellywelly wrote:IL is staying on the fence and he knows if the salary cap was raised he would lose players not only to the Ausy league but to Superleague clubs as well.His policy of replacing our top players with young players is to keep the wage bill down, not to win cups. This season we will struggle but I think we will be there about perhaps 5th or 6th
Don't know how you come to that conclusion? The whole idea of the game is to win trophy's :exc: :exc:
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
Kaii
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:43 pm

Re: So who's to blame this year?

Post by Kaii »

josie andrews wrote: Don't know how you come to that conclusion? The whole idea of the game is to win trophy's :exc: :exc:
We must of just imagined winning the grand final, league leaders shield & challenge cup twice over the last couple of years :eh:
Kittwazzer
Posts: 11307
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm

Re: So who's to blame this year?

Post by Kittwazzer »

Kaii wrote:
josie andrews wrote: Don't know how you come to that conclusion? The whole idea of the game is to win trophy's :exc: :exc:
We must of just imagined winning the grand final, league leaders shield & challenge cup twice over the last couple of years :eh:
Not done too badly for a selling club and a chairman with no ambition.

Too many people on here get more joy from moaning about what might happen this year than reflecting on the glories of last!
Owd Codger
Posts: 5628
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:20 am

Re: So who's to blame this year?

Post by Owd Codger »

Kittwazzer wrote:
Kaii wrote:
josie andrews wrote: Don't know how you come to that conclusion? The whole idea of the game is to win trophy's :exc: :exc:
We must of just imagined winning the grand final, league leaders shield & challenge cup twice over the last couple of years :eh:
Not done too badly for a selling club and a chairman with no ambition.

Too many people on here get more joy from moaning about what might happen this year than reflecting on the glories of last!
Exactly, but you will always find some who can't see the wood for the trees!
User avatar
TrueBlueWarrior
Posts: 6171
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm

Re: So who's to blame this year?

Post by TrueBlueWarrior »

And the award for silliest comment of the year and we are only in March goes to nellywelly!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
Kittwazzer
Posts: 11307
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm

Re: So who's to blame this year?

Post by Kittwazzer »

Field is wide open after today!
DaveO
Posts: 15931
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: So who's to blame this year?

Post by DaveO »

Kaii wrote:
nellywelly wrote:IL is staying on the fence and he knows if the salary cap was raised he would lose players not only to the Ausy league but to Superleague clubs as well.His policy of replacing our top players with young players is to keep the wage bill down, not to win cups. This season we will struggle but I think we will be there about perhaps 5th or 6th
How the hell did you work that out, we can pay more but will lose more players to not only the NRL but Superleague clubs.
I think Nelly meant was if the cap went up IL would not pay to the cap so clubs who did could bid for our players as Salford did with Hansen.
He didn't want to sell Sam, Lee, H or Pat they decided to leave themselves for different reasons.
That is not quite true. He could have kept H but chose not to match Salford's offer to H. He then decided to take a transfer fee rather than keep him to his last year of his contract. H needed IL's agreement to leave and he gave it.

As to the rest while he probably didn't want to them to leave he did let Sam go a year early from his so called cast iron 3 year exclusion clause as well.

However even if you can excuse all that what is obviously true is it wasn't news to IL these players were going to leave.

He had plenty of notice to recruit but I am not surprised we didn't make any real notable signings because if he won't pay the going rate for the likes of H he won't pay it for anyone of that standard or better.

He (and Wane) also knew we needed a goal kicker and we have not got one.
Post Reply