Sam T @ 6 for 2016?

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?

Post by cpwigan »

I would give George and Rocky 10 year contracts ASAP because I honestly believe they have the potential to be the best partnership since Gregory and Edwards. If I had to choose between Sam T or George and Rocky I would choose G&R.

I would retain Jake Shorrock as their understudy and release Sam Powell and Jamie Doran
medlocke
Posts: 10916
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:57 am
Location: Millom
Contact:

Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?

Post by medlocke »

shaunedwardsfan​club​ wrote:
cpwigan wrote:
medlocke wrote: The Bench, best place for him
Put some great money ball passes out today Meds and he has that combination with Budgie working perfectly too. Do you not rate him Meds?
He's obviously not seen him play.
Or maybe it was a bit of banter aimed at TBW :eusa4:
User avatar
TrueBlueWarrior
Posts: 6171
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm

Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?

Post by TrueBlueWarrior »

Hahahaha they will soon understand Meds!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
shaunedwardsfanclub
Posts: 6338
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?

Post by shaunedwardsfanclub »

medlocke wrote:
shaunedwardsfan​club​ wrote:
cpwigan wrote: Put some great money ball passes out today Meds and he has that combination with Budgie working perfectly too. Do you not rate him Meds?
He's obviously not seen him play.
Or maybe it was a bit of banter aimed at TBW :eusa4:
OK. Sorry Meds.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
Panchitta Marra
Posts: 6134
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?

Post by Panchitta Marra »

cpwigan wrote:I would give George and Rocky 10 year contracts ASAP because I honestly believe they have the potential to be the best partnership since Gregory and Edwards. If I had to choose between Sam T or George and Rocky I would choose G&R.

I would retain Jake Shorrock as their understudy and release Sam Powell and Jamie Doran
Matt Smith good enough to stay?
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?

Post by cpwigan »

Panchitta Marra wrote:
cpwigan wrote:I would give George and Rocky 10 year contracts ASAP because I honestly believe they have the potential to be the best partnership since Gregory and Edwards. If I had to choose between Sam T or George and Rocky I would choose G&R.

I would retain Jake Shorrock as their understudy and release Sam Powell and Jamie Doran
Matt Smith good enough to stay?
I do not think he would want to unless he was automatically selected week in week out. At this stage too IL can get a transfer fee for him.
medlocke
Posts: 10916
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:57 am
Location: Millom
Contact:

Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?

Post by medlocke »

shaunedwardsfan​club​ wrote:
medlocke wrote:
shaunedwardsfan​club​ wrote: He's obviously not seen him play.
Or maybe it was a bit of banter aimed at TBW :eusa4:
OK. Sorry Meds.
You are forgiven :lol:
NeeNawWarrior22
Posts: 337
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 7:27 pm

Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?

Post by NeeNawWarrior22 »

I would actually like to see Sam at 6, Smith at 7 and George playing interchange with MM at 9.
Although his form has been pretty dire this year so far (in comparison to what he's capable of), I am a big fan of Matty Smith.
Panchitta Marra
Posts: 6134
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm

Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?

Post by Panchitta Marra »

cpwigan wrote:
Panchitta Marra wrote:
cpwigan wrote:I would give George and Rocky 10 year contracts ASAP because I honestly believe they have the potential to be the best partnership since Gregory and Edwards. If I had to choose between Sam T or George and Rocky I would choose G&R.

I would retain Jake Shorrock as their understudy and release Sam Powell and Jamie Doran
Matt Smith good enough to stay?
I do not think he would want to unless he was automatically selected week in week out. At this stage too IL can get a transfer fee for him.
Is Smith good enough in your opinion to stay?
Also would you choose to release Sam Powell and Jamie Doran ahead of Matty Smith?
thegimble
Posts: 5969
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?

Post by thegimble »

Panchitta Marra wrote:
cpwigan wrote:
Panchitta Marra wrote: Matt Smith good enough to stay?
I do not think he would want to unless he was automatically selected week in week out. At this stage too IL can get a transfer fee for him.
Is Smith good enough in your opinion to stay?
Also would you choose to release Sam Powell and Jamie Doran ahead of Matty Smith?
Smith is more than good enough so long as we control the ball. First 20 minutes yesterday we had 4-5 handling errors any 6-7 combination will struggle to look good.

Second half yesterday he played very well. He can not play on the backfoot but no player can.
Post Reply