Sam Tomkins Position?

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
Owd Codger
Posts: 5628
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:20 am

Re: Sam Tomkins Position?

Post by Owd Codger »

cpwigan wrote:Ultimately a reflection on SL. The worrying aspect is that if British players cannot produce week in week out we will not win a series v Aus or a tournament.
We will never win a series against Australia, because we no longer produce enough home produced quality players of International standard and no longer have top class players coming from Union, especially Wales, like we had in the great days of the past to create the right blend of class.

And why dilute Great Britain into England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland when less quality is now in the game compared with the days prior to 1996 when Union went professional?

Perhaps, play the four nations in the World Cup, but never in Test Matches against Australia and New Zealand.
,
Caboosegg
Posts: 4038
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 4:51 pm

Re: Sam Tomkins Position?

Post by Caboosegg »

Whelley Warrior wrote:
cpwigan wrote:Ultimately a reflection on SL. The worrying aspect is that if British players cannot produce week in week out we will not win a series v Aus or a tournament.
We will never win a series against Australia, because we no longer produce enough home produced quality players of International standard and no longer have top class players coming from Union, especially Wales, like we had in the great days of the past to create the right blend of class.

And why dilute Great Britain into England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland when less quality is now in the game compared with the days prior to 1996 when Union went professional?

Perhaps, play the four nations in the World Cup, but never in Test Matches against Australia and New Zealand.
,
know i cant comment on yesteryear but to say we are miles of the Aussies/NZ is a bit harsh to the England players, we were one wrong decision of beating the Aussies (curtsey of biased video reffing) and seconds from beating NZ - if sinfield hadn't run out of the line to quickly.


on the original subject, if Sam doesn't play fullback something is wrong with Wanes head it is after all were he has made him name and perfected his trade (even if not his Orginal/youth position) however with the fact hes been out twice this season with injury, i can see hampshire getting some game time if still around next year.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
John Ferguson
Posts: 142
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:28 pm

Re: Sam Tomkins Position?

Post by John Ferguson »

cpwigan wrote:Just to throw a spanner in the thinking process. I would select Sam at half-back for England and at FB for Wigan.
My thinking too. Hardaker should be FB.
User avatar
Kiwiseddon
Posts: 1160
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:59 am

Re: Sam Tomkins Position?

Post by Kiwiseddon »

cpwigan wrote:Just to throw a spanner in the thinking process. I would select Sam at half-back for England and at FB for Wigan.
Totally agree. With the season Hardaker has had we'd want him and Sam on the pitch for England. Hardcore at 1, Sam at 6 and Widdop at 7 for me.
"K"

"But look at, look at Lydon go here...Remniscent of those two great tries when he won the Lance Todd... He's got Hanley inside him. He's going all the way..........."
cow yeds
Posts: 1149
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:42 am

Re: Sam Tomkins Position?

Post by cow yeds »

Watched the game this morning unless Tomkins has gone back a lot Hardaker isn't in the same class.
Post Reply