Poor reflection on Lockers?
-
- Posts: 38449
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Re: Poor reflection on Lockers?
Another fall guy :exc:
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
Re: Poor reflection on Lockers?
Josie, we keep failing; we need to learn and that means people being held accountable. Not fall guys simply reality. We played very poorly in the GF v a team who were shattered but incredibly gutsy.
Re: Poor reflection on Lockers?
Leading by example has never really been leading at all. If the younger players are looking for direction and leadership on the field the fact Lockers runs himself into the ground doesn't provide what is required.nathan_rugby wrote:
He isn't a vocal captain like Farrell was. What I think we learned to understand is that Lockers as a captain was through the level of professionalism he shows and leading by example. He used to do his talking on the pitch often coming up with good drives, offloads, link up play as he sometimes acted like a 6. But now as he is getting older, his play isn't doing the talking for him anymore. He is very much so on the decline and maybe is finding it hard to play like a captain and lead from the front.
When things are going well there is no need to be vocal or to start dictating or directing more often and more forcefully but when we have looked clueless this season no one (not just Lockers) has taken the mantle and changed things on the pitch. Lockers has missed quite a few games and so the other senior players are just as guilty as him.
Re: Poor reflection on Lockers?
Hindsight is priceless.
-
- Posts: 4371
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Poor reflection on Lockers?
15 minutes to go we take the 2 to create a 4 point lead? Against a team known for scoring at the last minute and also one who is very good at penalties/conversions...sheepsteeth wrote:I would have gone for the 6 points personally because I felt at that point if we'd got an 8 point lead the games was over. Having said that I have no real problem with taking the two, just a bit of a "what if?" feeling.
I think at times people just find fault, to some on here we've been too expansive with "waneball" and shift plays in our half and when we show some conservatism they get fingers pointed too.
Terrible decision.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
Re: Poor reflection on Lockers?
Time up.Bateman to LF and OL retired from Wigan. All wages reviewed against performance,see if we find a way to win.From the wheeltappers social and benefits club for people whose face fits?
mp
Re: Poor reflection on Lockers?
Simply not good enough anymorejosie andrews wrote:Another fall guy :exc:
Re: Poor reflection on Lockers?
Not the player he was but also that decision did not cost us the game. Their last try did (was a bad one to concede) and the last 15 minutes where no one apart from Faz and Bowen looked like creating anything.medlocke wrote:Simply not good enough anymorejosie andrews wrote:Another fall guy :exc:
-
- Posts: 4371
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Poor reflection on Lockers?
Gildart out of position and caught in no mans land was one of the main reasons for the last try. Hasn't been picked up by many on here.thegimble wrote:Not the player he was but also that decision did not cost us the game. Their last try did (was a bad one to concede) and the last 15 minutes where no one apart from Faz and Bowen looked like creating anything.medlocke wrote:Simply not good enough anymorejosie andrews wrote:Another fall guy :exc:
The decision changed the game but didn't really change it enough. Going for the 6, going for a repeated set, pinning Leeds down would have allowed the potential to get back into the arm wrestle, put them under pressure, pin them down and force the error.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
Re: Poor reflection on Lockers?
I agree on both. People are blaming a lot of things but we were not good enough on the day. We played well for 15 minutes and Leeds could not live with us.nathan_rugby wrote:Gildart out of position and caught in no mans land was one of the main reasons for the last try. Hasn't been picked up by many on here.thegimble wrote:Not the player he was but also that decision did not cost us the game. Their last try did (was a bad one to concede) and the last 15 minutes where no one apart from Faz and Bowen looked like creating anything.medlocke wrote:Simply not good enough anymore
The decision changed the game but didn't really change it enough. Going for the 6, going for a repeated set, pinning Leeds down would have allowed the potential to get back into the arm wrestle, put them under pressure, pin them down and force the error.