Re: Disciplinary?
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2015 12:02 am
Re: Disciplinary?
Dave O - Yes. Sorry we do, don't we? I read it wrong! Sorry!
- TrueBlueWarrior
- Posts: 6171
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: Disciplinary?
If one of my team mates that I trusted and respected b***** my wife I would do more than what has been alleged here, that for me is the difference! One was alcohol fuelled alleged violence with no serious injury and the other far worse, again in my opinion!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
-
- Posts: 5628
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:20 am
Re: Disciplinary?
A pity that some have nothing better to do then keep going on about a incident which as usual may have been a mountain made out of a molehill by the dreaded social media of facebook and twitter.
Cause nothing but trouble for many!
Cause nothing but trouble for many!
-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Disciplinary?
Any of those three is what I was meaning Fujiman, thanks for highlighting my mathematical weakness ????????Fujiman wrote:Thats threePanchitta Marra wrote:Will be interesting to see which two players drop out of the 19, Sutton, Mossop and Bateman dropping out would continue the rumour mongering.![]()
Re: Disciplinary?
I knew what you meant PM but thought it was funny. Didnt mean to offendPanchitta Marra wrote:Any of those three is what I was meaning Fujiman, thanks for highlighting my mathematical weakness ????????Fujiman wrote:Thats threePanchitta Marra wrote:Will be interesting to see which two players drop out of the 19, Sutton, Mossop and Bateman dropping out would continue the rumour mongering.![]()

-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Disciplinary?
No offence taken Fujiman, the big smile in your link was well understood. ????Fujiman wrote:I knew what you meant PM but thought it was funny. Didnt mean to offendPanchitta Marra wrote:Any of those three is what I was meaning Fujiman, thanks for highlighting my mathematical weakness ????????Fujiman wrote:Thats three![]()
![]()
Re: Disciplinary?
Is that official?OAMJSON wrote:so NO Bateman but Mossop in
Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.
Re: Disciplinary?
And the club and police - don't forget they also commented.Whelley Warrior wrote:A pity that some have nothing better to do then keep going on about a incident which as usual may have been a mountain made out of a molehill by the dreaded social media of facebook and twitter.
Cause nothing but trouble for many!
-
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:35 am
Re: Disciplinary?
equally one suggesting 4 week suspension without pay in addition to a fine for Bateman..