2017 Signings

Got a hot rumour from a source inside the club, or just something you heard down the pub? Then what are you waiting for, post it on The Rumour Mill.
Forum rules
Post Reply
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: 2017 Signings

Post by cpwigan »

Unless any existing players are released I personally think we are done for 2017 but Brad is far more knowledgeable than I am a. A versatile back like Eastmond would be great BUT he will be damn expensive whomever he signs for.
Top
dontshootthemessenger
Posts: 186
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 12:32 am

Re: 2017 Signings

Post by dontshootthemessenger »

having given debuts to 8 academy players this season , and presumably more youngsters to be given contracts (?), I cant see how the squad isn't too big.
Top
eccywarrior
Posts: 1148
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:37 pm

Re: 2017 Signings

Post by eccywarrior »

Shouldnt we look after players we got before signing anybodyelse.there is a certain player in first team who wants more money but he was rejected and could leave the club
IN WANE WE TRUST
Top
fozzieskem
Posts: 6494
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am

Re: 2017 Signings

Post by fozzieskem »

moto748 wrote:
ddtftf wrote:There are complications with Eastman, as the RFU pays part of his salary.
That's pretty good business from Bath's point of view, then, as Eastmond looks well away from the England set-up these days.

So the RFU will in effect subsidise clubs who want to poach players from league? Charming.
Can you imagine the RFL doing likewise? :lol:
Top
thegimble
Posts: 5970
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: 2017 Signings

Post by thegimble »

fozzieskem wrote:
moto748 wrote:
ddtftf wrote:There are complications with Eastman, as the RFU pays part of his salary.
That's pretty good business from Bath's point of view, then, as Eastmond looks well away from the England set-up these days.

So the RFU will in effect subsidise clubs who want to poach players from league? Charming.
Can you imagine the RFL doing likewise? :lol:
They did once for 2 players. Rads and KFC.

With the profit they now make they need to put a bit in to keep the best players in SL.
Top
Kittwazzer
Posts: 11308
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm

Re: 2017 Signings

Post by Kittwazzer »

thegimble wrote:
fozzieskem wrote:
moto748 wrote:
So the RFU will in effect subsidise clubs who want to poach players from league? Charming.
Can you imagine the RFL doing likewise? :lol:
They did once for 2 players. Rads and KFC.

With the profit they now make they need to put a bit in to keep the best players in SL.
RFL profit isn't that high after Nigel's Lunch Allowances have been paid!
Top
thegimble
Posts: 5970
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: 2017 Signings

Post by thegimble »

Kittwazzer wrote:
thegimble wrote:
fozzieskem wrote: Can you imagine the RFL doing likewise? :lol:
They did once for 2 players. Rads and KFC.

With the profit they now make they need to put a bit in to keep the best players in SL.
RFL profit isn't that high after Nigel's Lunch Allowances have been paid!
No profit after that.
Top
User avatar
superleague
Posts: 1766
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:38 pm

Re: 2017 Signings

Post by superleague »

eccywarrior wrote:Shouldnt we look after players we got before signing anybodyelse.there is a certain player in first team who wants more money but he was rejected and could leave the club
Who?
Top
Post Reply

Return to “The Rumour Mill”