Stains v Hull
Stains v Hull
Who do we want to win? They can't both lose, unfortunately.
Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.
Re: Stains v Hull
More errors than a Wigan v warrington match!
Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.
Re: Stains v Hull
Roby is very good as per usual but taking into account they are both full time professional sides it's been very poor. Just no brains on show.
Re: Stains v Hull
Feel sorry for Jon Wells trying to talk this game up.
Re: Stains v Hull
Bentham clearly wanted saints to win.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
Re: Stains v Hull
If we have any pretensions of reaching the top 4, I think that result is what we wanted.
Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.
-
Wiganer Ted
- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:31 pm
Re: Stains v Hull
Never back an away team when Bentham or Child are refereeing.
Bentham didn't award a single penalty to us in the first 50 mins at Hull. Child did the same to Wakey at Headingly.
Absolute disgrace both of them.
Bentham didn't award a single penalty to us in the first 50 mins at Hull. Child did the same to Wakey at Headingly.
Absolute disgrace both of them.
-
Panchitta Marra
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Stains v Hull
Thought that too.Caboosegg wrote:Bentham clearly wanted saints to win.
Some very iffy knock ons awarded to Sintelins, one leading to a converted try.
