And the fuse just got lit.Wigan_forever1985 wrote:They also took richie mathers and scott moore - they arent infallible and often they take punts, josh hodgson was a nobody when he went over likewise Mike Cooper.old hooker wrote:They took sarge and he is very poor.No straw damn us wrote:If Williams is "so poor" why the interest from Australia?
Williams for me is an Albert Kelly type player, put him with a steady 7 who manages the game and he is deadly - give him the responsibility of managing the game and he is bang average
Richardson is better than Williams btw
george williams to australia
Re: george williams to australia
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: george williams to australia
The first time I clapped eyes on Richardson I thought him good,he just gets better though each time I see him,quite how he wasn’t picked for the Denver test I’ll never know,he’s good enough,if and when Holbrook goes home I wonder if he will alert teams over there to him? Assuming they all ready know of course it seems to me always better coming from the horses mouth so to speak
- Wigan_forever1985
- Posts: 6673
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm
Re: george williams to australia
He really reminds me of long and having long teaching him will help him develop no end. He's cocky - like a scrum half should be he tries things others wouldnt and wants to be the centre of every play - again like a good scrum half should befozzieskem wrote:The first time I clapped eyes on Richardson I thought him good,he just gets better though each time I see him,quite how he wasn’t picked for the Denver test I’ll never know,he’s good enough,if and when Holbrook goes home I wonder if he will alert teams over there to him? Assuming they all ready know of course it seems to me always better coming from the horses mouth so to speak
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
-
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:53 pm
Re: george williams to australia
Wigan_forever1985 wrote:They also took richie mathers and scott moore - they arent infallible and often they take punts, josh hodgson was a nobody when he went over likewise Mike Cooper.old hooker wrote:They took sarge and he is very poor.No straw damn us wrote:If Williams is "so poor" why the interest from Australia?
Williams for me is an Albert Kelly type player, put him with a steady 7 who manages the game and he is deadly - give him the responsibility of managing the game and he is bang average
Richardson is better than Williams btw
You are right Richardson is a better player tha Williams, and the latter is not fit to lace Kellys boots.
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: george williams to australia
That's interesting, why do you think so?Wigan_forever1985 wrote:They also took richie mathers and scott moore - they arent infallible and often they take punts, josh hodgson was a nobody when he went over likewise Mike Cooper.old hooker wrote:They took sarge and he is very poor.No straw damn us wrote:If Williams is "so poor" why the interest from Australia?
Williams for me is an Albert Kelly type player, put him with a steady 7 who manages the game and he is deadly - give him the responsibility of managing the game and he is bang average
Richardson is better than Williams btw
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
- Wigan_forever1985
- Posts: 6673
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm
Re: george williams to australia
I think he just is a better all round scrum half, he runs games for saints - now granted a different coach may elevate Williams but a documented issue for Williams is how vocal he is and how much command he takes of a game. Bennett told him this was an area of his game he had to address but even after a couple of years i don't see it improving.shaunedwardsfanclub wrote:That's interesting, why do you think so?Wigan_forever1985 wrote:They also took richie mathers and scott moore - they arent infallible and often they take punts, josh hodgson was a nobody when he went over likewise Mike Cooper.old hooker wrote: They took sarge and he is very poor.
Williams for me is an Albert Kelly type player, put him with a steady 7 who manages the game and he is deadly - give him the responsibility of managing the game and he is bang average
Richardson is better than Williams btw
Williams has got a cruel step and is good off the cuff but for me Richardson runs the game, he sets the plays up and dominates play like long used to do. Williams can go missing in games.
i just think Richardson has more in his arsenal
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
Re: george williams to australia
No straw damn us wrote:If Williams is "so poor" why the interest from Australia?
Sorry could not resist " They gave Sargenson a contract " and he was sensational at the Gold Coast I think not . then the bastards dumped him back on us to make us pay.
Re: george williams to australia
Lolddtftf wrote:No straw damn us wrote:If Williams is "so poor" why the interest from Australia?
Sorry could not resist " They gave Sargenson a contract " and he was sensational at the Gold Coast I think not . then the bastards dumped him back on us to make us pay.
They were looking for idiots who buys back failed players and they knew where to go to.
Re: george williams to australia
I wont miss him never markee pkayer
Re: george williams to australia
i wouldn't want him to go and under a new coach who knows how good he could beSuzieb wrote:I wont miss him never markee pkayer