Recruitment.
Re: Recruitment.
No, but I wish it was! He’s strongly linked with Wire
-
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm
Re: Recruitment.
Been plenty rumours about Miller for a while maybe as the half. Not beenn aware of any winger ones.
If the wingers not coming who was it? Can't see many who fit either prolific or the bloody good signing tag.
If the wingers not coming who was it? Can't see many who fit either prolific or the bloody good signing tag.
Re: Recruitment.
Definitely prolific. Bloody good signing in my opinion as its a game of opinions. Greg Eden.
Re: Recruitment.
Rather see how the London lad goes to be honest than Eden.. also with Marshall Bibby Halsall and Hanley think we have cover. Field could lay a lot of worries over a half to one side over next few weeks though we need cover or quality depending on that.
A good centre would be more of a priority for me squad wise than wing looking at the makeup as it stands or with Thornley. Obviously Zak situation and how Field goes would play major roles on what we need to add.
Forwards seem pretty strong depth wise again a lot will depend on impact of Mago and Ellis.
Personally still think Bullock could kick on but happy enough with the two lads coming in over Clubb and Clarke.
Again Havard, Byrne, Partington and I suppose you can add Smithies all have questions to what level they kick on to Singleton Im fine with personally.
Back row with Faz Bateman KPP and Isa looks as good as any we can add Partington Havard into the 13 mix Smithies loose and second row. Hooker obviously Powell mainly and O'Neil to play more.
A good centre would be more of a priority for me squad wise than wing looking at the makeup as it stands or with Thornley. Obviously Zak situation and how Field goes would play major roles on what we need to add.
Forwards seem pretty strong depth wise again a lot will depend on impact of Mago and Ellis.
Personally still think Bullock could kick on but happy enough with the two lads coming in over Clubb and Clarke.
Again Havard, Byrne, Partington and I suppose you can add Smithies all have questions to what level they kick on to Singleton Im fine with personally.
Back row with Faz Bateman KPP and Isa looks as good as any we can add Partington Havard into the 13 mix Smithies loose and second row. Hooker obviously Powell mainly and O'Neil to play more.
-
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm
Re: Recruitment.
We have an issue! We need to remove one non-trained player from our squad to accommodate the new signings. If we were to sign Miller has was suggested then I assume that we would need to move two on. If Tommy was to retire then the rumours about Clark being offered to other clubs would fit. The second problem is that the list of ‘out of contract’ players contains no players of outstanding quality and consequently we would be trying to sign somebody who is not likely to improve our current squad.
I would rather we tried to sign a player from the NRL or pay a transfer fee for a SL halfback.
I would rather we tried to sign a player from the NRL or pay a transfer fee for a SL halfback.
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:45 pm
Re: Recruitment.
That London lad has been going great with HANKINSON as his centre partnerlucky 13 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 19, 2021 11:21 pm Rather see how the London lad goes to be honest than Eden.. also with Marshall Bibby Halsall and Hanley think we have cover. Field could lay a lot of worries over a half to one side over next few weeks though we need cover or quality depending on that.
A good centre would be more of a priority for me squad wise than wing looking at the makeup as it stands or with Thornley. Obviously Zak situation and how Field goes would play major roles on what we need to add.
Forwards seem pretty strong depth wise again a lot will depend on impact of Mago and Ellis.
Personally still think Bullock could kick on but happy enough with the two lads coming in over Clubb and Clarke.
Again Havard, Byrne, Partington and I suppose you can add Smithies all have questions to what level they kick on to Singleton Im fine with personally.
Back row with Faz Bateman KPP and Isa looks as good as any we can add Partington Havard into the 13 mix Smithies loose and second row. Hooker obviously Powell mainly and O'Neil to play more.
-
- Posts: 4372
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Recruitment.
What is your connection to Hankinson? It’s getting boring now.jackthelad wrote: ↑Fri Aug 20, 2021 1:45 amThat London lad has been going great with HANKINSON as his centre partnerlucky 13 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 19, 2021 11:21 pm Rather see how the London lad goes to be honest than Eden.. also with Marshall Bibby Halsall and Hanley think we have cover. Field could lay a lot of worries over a half to one side over next few weeks though we need cover or quality depending on that.
A good centre would be more of a priority for me squad wise than wing looking at the makeup as it stands or with Thornley. Obviously Zak situation and how Field goes would play major roles on what we need to add.
Forwards seem pretty strong depth wise again a lot will depend on impact of Mago and Ellis.
Personally still think Bullock could kick on but happy enough with the two lads coming in over Clubb and Clarke.
Again Havard, Byrne, Partington and I suppose you can add Smithies all have questions to what level they kick on to Singleton Im fine with personally.
Back row with Faz Bateman KPP and Isa looks as good as any we can add Partington Havard into the 13 mix Smithies loose and second row. Hooker obviously Powell mainly and O'Neil to play more.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
Re: Recruitment.
Change the record jacktheladjackthelad wrote: ↑Fri Aug 20, 2021 1:45 amThat London lad has been going great with HANKINSON as his centre partnerlucky 13 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 19, 2021 11:21 pm Rather see how the London lad goes to be honest than Eden.. also with Marshall Bibby Halsall and Hanley think we have cover. Field could lay a lot of worries over a half to one side over next few weeks though we need cover or quality depending on that.
A good centre would be more of a priority for me squad wise than wing looking at the makeup as it stands or with Thornley. Obviously Zak situation and how Field goes would play major roles on what we need to add.
Forwards seem pretty strong depth wise again a lot will depend on impact of Mago and Ellis.
Personally still think Bullock could kick on but happy enough with the two lads coming in over Clubb and Clarke.
Again Havard, Byrne, Partington and I suppose you can add Smithies all have questions to what level they kick on to Singleton Im fine with personally.
Back row with Faz Bateman KPP and Isa looks as good as any we can add Partington Havard into the 13 mix Smithies loose and second row. Hooker obviously Powell mainly and O'Neil to play more.