Wigan vs Huddersfield

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
Post Reply
Big stick
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2020 4:19 pm

Wigan vs Huddersfield

Post by Big stick »

Looks like Huddersfield will be without Fages
josie andrews
Posts: 36168
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Wigan vs Huddersfield

Post by josie andrews »

And also Danny Levi.

Danny Levi #9, Huddersfield

Competition:
Super League

Match:
Huddersfield v Hull KR

Match Date:
2022-02-19

Incident:
Pulls at injured player at 20:30

Decision:
Charge

Charge Detail:
Law 15.1(i)

Behaves in any way contrary to the true spirit of the game (includes Dangerous Contact) – Other contrary behaviour

Grade C

Sanctions:
2 Match Penalty Notice
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
josie andrews
Posts: 36168
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Wigan vs Huddersfield

Post by josie andrews »

Kade Ellis #15, Wigan

Competition:
Super League

Match:
Wigan v Leeds

Match Date:
2022-02-18

Incident:
Contact with Referee at 03:13

Decision:
Caution

Charge Detail:
Law 15.1(i)

Deliberate or reckless physical contact with a match official (e.g. placing hand on arm to attract attention)

Decision On Charge
Decision on Sanction (where found to have committed misconduct:

—————

Brad Singleton #8, Wigan

Competition:
Super League

Match:
Wigan v Leeds

Match Date:
2022-02-18

Incident:
Shoulder charge at 1:34:57

Decision:
No charge

Charge Detail:
No illegal shoulder charge. Players have clashed in the tackle and come up and out on exit.

Decision On Charge
Decision on Sanction (where found to have committed misconduct:

—————

Liam Tindall #29, Leeds

Competition:
Super League

Match:
Wigan v Leeds

Match Date:
2022-02-18

Incident:
Obstruction at 1:41:48

Decision:
No charge

Charge Detail:
Player obstructs opponent who is chasing a kick through. Professional foul.

Decision On Charge
Decision on Sanction (where found to have committed misconduct:
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
josie andrews
Posts: 36168
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Wigan vs Huddersfield

Post by josie andrews »

Big stick wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:46 pm Looks like Huddersfield will be without Fages
Theo Fages #7, Huddersfield

Competition:
Super League

Match:
Huddersfield v Hull KR

Match Date:
2022-02-19

Incident:
Crusher tackle at 20:12

Decision:
Charge

Charge Detail:
Charge

Law 15.1(i) - Dangerous Contact - Defending player, in or after effecting a tackle, uses any part of their body forcefully to bend or apply unnecessary pressure to the head and/or neck and/or spinal column of the tackled player so as to keep the tackled player at a disadvantage in or after the tackle.

Grade B

Sanctions:
1 Match Penalty Notice
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
moto748
Posts: 4755
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Wigan vs Huddersfield

Post by moto748 »

That's the right decision on Tindall; there really wasn't much in it.
josie andrews
Posts: 36168
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Wigan vs Huddersfield

Post by josie andrews »

moto748 wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:13 pm That's the right decision on Tindall; there really wasn't much in it.
I don’t even think it warranted a yellow.
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
Nezza Faz
Posts: 1936
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: Wigan vs Huddersfield

Post by Nezza Faz »

josie andrews wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:19 pm
moto748 wrote: Mon Feb 21, 2022 6:13 pm That's the right decision on Tindall; there really wasn't much in it.
I don’t even think it warranted a yellow.
Yeah, just a straight penalty I thought, just 2 players fighting for possession towards the in-goal. It happens.
the pieman
Posts: 1393
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 5:34 pm

Re: Wigan vs Huddersfield

Post by the pieman »

does anyone else find it amazing that all these ex-saints players are all picking up bans now they have moved on :) :) :)

100% perfect disciplinary records at Saints and now they are all copping bans
Post Reply