Loose forward
Loose forward
Anyone any ideas who will play 13 this week in the absence of ellis i would put thompson there personally
-
- Posts: 4370
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Loose forward
Most likely Thompson.
Regardless of who it is, there won’t be an increase in ball playing / passing just because they’re playing at loose. They will just be utilised as an extra prop.
Regardless of who it is, there won’t be an increase in ball playing / passing just because they’re playing at loose. They will just be utilised as an extra prop.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
- Firestarter
- Posts: 6237
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Loose forward
Ill go mago coz i cant remember thompson ever being a ball player
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
-
- Posts: 3487
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:31 pm
Re: Loose forward
I was hoping they'd rest Thompson.
Perhaps Mago will go to 13 but I'd prefer Dupree.
Perhaps Mago will go to 13 but I'd prefer Dupree.
- Firestarter
- Posts: 6237
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Loose forward
We might leave leeming and forber on together at some point.this would make extra ball players in the middlenathan_rugby wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2024 5:27 pm Most likely Thompson.
Regardless of who it is, there won’t be an increase in ball playing / passing just because they’re playing at loose. They will just be utilised as an extra prop.
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Re: Loose forward
Yes, I'm looking forward to it. Both sides depleted, but some interesting options.
-
- Posts: 4370
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Loose forward
I don’t see the need or value in doing this.Firestarter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2024 6:16 pmWe might leave leeming and forber on together at some point.this would make extra ball players in the middlenathan_rugby wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2024 5:27 pm Most likely Thompson.
Regardless of who it is, there won’t be an increase in ball playing / passing just because they’re playing at loose. They will just be utilised as an extra prop.
7, 6, and 1 are plenty enough ball players.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
- Firestarter
- Posts: 6237
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Loose forward
We have done this before when we have been chasing a game.Not very often ,but we have.nathan_rugby wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 7:40 amI don’t see the need or value in doing this.Firestarter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2024 6:16 pmWe might leave leeming and forber on together at some point.this would make extra ball players in the middlenathan_rugby wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2024 5:27 pm Most likely Thompson.
Regardless of who it is, there won’t be an increase in ball playing / passing just because they’re playing at loose. They will just be utilised as an extra prop.
7, 6, and 1 are plenty enough ball players.
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
- Firestarter
- Posts: 6237
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Loose forward
We also might want to rack up some serious pointsFirestarter wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 8:36 amWe have done this before when we have been chasing a game.Not very often ,but we have.nathan_rugby wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 7:40 amI don’t see the need or value in doing this.Firestarter wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2024 6:16 pm
We might leave leeming and forber on together at some point.this would make extra ball players in the middle
7, 6, and 1 are plenty enough ball players.
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE