I agree, FS. We shouldn't overlook the fact that we need to respect Leyth and beat them first
In terms of who I'd like us to play if we make it to the final, I think us v Rovers would be more entertaining. However, I'd feel more confident on the day if it was Wire. Their record in Grand Finals speaks for itself
None of this negates the point that we can be beaten whatever our expectations lead us to believe. I'm sure that our coach is cognisant of this.
And nothing I said suggested that, Archie, as the highlighted section above indicates.
I appreciate that point Morley but "in all honesty "you agreed withFs which"suggests "in all honesty " if we play well we'll win. I agree with the sentiment but, as is my want,this doesn't logically speaking,necessarily follow
Fujiman wrote: ↑Fri Sep 27, 2024 6:05 pm
we’ll see, just feel they have a big game left in them yet and wire are a bit like emperors new clothes.Would be good to beat saints in the semi though
it was close Williams the difference . What do I know
I think KR will do wire
If KR had Minchella, I'd make them odds on favourites. Without him reckon it's 50/50.
archiekeith wrote: ↑Mon Sep 30, 2024 10:12 pm
None of this negates the point that we can be beaten whatever our expectations lead us to believe. I'm sure that our coach is cognisant of this.
And nothing I said suggested that, Archie, as the highlighted section above indicates.
I appreciate that point Morley but "in all honesty "you agreed withFs which"suggests "in all honesty " if we play well we'll win. I agree with the sentiment but, as is my want,this doesn't logically speaking,necessarily follow
And nothing I said suggested that, Archie, as the highlighted section above indicates.
I appreciate that point Morley but "in all honesty "you agreed withFs which"suggests "in all honesty " if we play well we'll win. I agree with the sentiment but, as is my want,this doesn't logically speaking,necessarily follow
If you say so . . .
Yes I do say so. In fact In by transitivity what you say wasn't asuggested it was infact it was a replication of Fs's assertion "if we play well we win" As you have possibly told your students. " Listen and learn
I appreciate that point Morley but "in all honesty "you agreed withFs which"suggests "in all honesty " if we play well we'll win. I agree with the sentiment but, as is my want,this doesn't logically speaking,necessarily follow
If you say so . . .
Yes I do say so. In fact In by transitivity what you say wasn't asuggested it was infact it was a replication of Fs's assertion "if we play well we win" As you have possibly told your students. " Listen and learn
I reckon if we play well against Leigh, we'll win.
Yes I do say so. In fact In by transitivity what you say wasn't asuggested it was infact it was a replication of Fs's assertion "if we play well we win" As you have possibly told your students. " Listen and learn
I reckon if we play well against Leigh, we'll win.
Yes I do say so. In fact In by transitivity what you say wasn't asuggested it was infact it was a replication of Fs's assertion "if we play well we win" As you have possibly told your students. " Listen and learn
I reckon if we play well against Leigh, we'll win.
Jesus its a very circular thing this forum
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
It ok Fs's. I'm with the AA Re Mikes post It's logically possiblefor a team to play not all that well and still win. What does follow necessarily is having more points on the scoreboard than your opponents. I'm embarrassed to say such an obvious fact.
