GRAND FINAL TO STAY AT OLD TRAFFORD UNTIL 2027

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
User avatar
Mike
Site Admin
Posts: 7980
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 6:54 pm
Contact:

Re: GRAND FINAL TO STAY AT OLD TRAFFORD UNTIL 2027

Post by Mike »

Firestarter wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 6:59 pm
Firestarter wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 6:58 pm
Caboosegg wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:19 am I'd rather the Ethiad. The stupid rule of no booze at your seat leads to people getting drunk before gand and increases chances of fighting.
I agree on both accounts
only prob we had with etihad was getting back into the city centre pubs afterwards
Its a pretty short walk isn't it? Closer than OT anyway.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
🏆🏆🏆🏆
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm

Re: GRAND FINAL TO STAY AT OLD TRAFFORD UNTIL 2027

Post by Firestarter »

Mike wrote: Tue Oct 08, 2024 5:38 pm
Firestarter wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 6:59 pm
Firestarter wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 6:58 pm
I agree on both accounts
only prob we had with etihad was getting back into the city centre pubs afterwards
Its a pretty short walk isn't it? Closer than OT anyway.
It was a nightmare to get the tram last magic and only 1 pub across the road.That was the dis advantages
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
moto748
Posts: 5434
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: GRAND FINAL TO STAY AT OLD TRAFFORD UNTIL 2027

Post by moto748 »

I say it every year, but my issue with OT is the minuscule in-goal and that slope!

And, more generally, I think it's disgraceful that the size of the in-goal is not fixed in the laws of the game. or at the very least, set within reasonable max and min figures. I remember Aussie fans complaining at the WCC about the size of the in-goals at the Brick, but I think it's fair to say that Wigan's aren't much different to most SL grounds, and in the NRL they do seem to be a bit bigger. Although nothing like the five-acre fields you get in Union! :lol: But OT's are too small, and dangerously so.
Post Reply