Ellis and O’Neill top tackle charts
-
- Posts: 38427
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Ellis and O’Neill top tackle charts
KAIDE ELLIS TOPPED THE BETFRED SUPER LEAGUE TACKLE CHARTS FOR WIGAN WARRIORS WHILST BRAD O’NEILL AVERAGED THE HIGHEST PER GAME.
The Warriors completed 8,391 tackles throughout the Betfred Super League season – play-offs included – as Matt Peet’s side finished the campaign with the second fewest tackles missed [788].
Ellis recorded the most tackles in league action with 761 and a 29.27 average per game. The loose forward’s highest figure came in the Betfred Super League Grand Final [56] as well as Round 5 and Round 6 matches against Salford Red Devils [46] and St Helens [47].
Luke Thompson closely followed with 751 completed tackles with an average 27.81 per match. The England international produced huge numbers in victories against Hull KR in Round 25 [45] and the Grand Final [48].
Liam Farrell recorded 699 tackles with an average 29.13 per game, whilst England internationals Ethan Havard and Junior Nsemba averaged 28.33 and 23.75 tackles per game after completing 595 and 570.
O’Neill averaged the highest tackles per game [30.29] for the Warriors in the competition. The hooker, who suffered a season-ending ACL injury in July, also completed the most Warriors tackles in the Betfred World Club Challenge [48] and the Betfred Challenge Cup Final [36].
https://wiganwarriors.com/blog/2024/11/ ... le-charts/
The Warriors completed 8,391 tackles throughout the Betfred Super League season – play-offs included – as Matt Peet’s side finished the campaign with the second fewest tackles missed [788].
Ellis recorded the most tackles in league action with 761 and a 29.27 average per game. The loose forward’s highest figure came in the Betfred Super League Grand Final [56] as well as Round 5 and Round 6 matches against Salford Red Devils [46] and St Helens [47].
Luke Thompson closely followed with 751 completed tackles with an average 27.81 per match. The England international produced huge numbers in victories against Hull KR in Round 25 [45] and the Grand Final [48].
Liam Farrell recorded 699 tackles with an average 29.13 per game, whilst England internationals Ethan Havard and Junior Nsemba averaged 28.33 and 23.75 tackles per game after completing 595 and 570.
O’Neill averaged the highest tackles per game [30.29] for the Warriors in the competition. The hooker, who suffered a season-ending ACL injury in July, also completed the most Warriors tackles in the Betfred World Club Challenge [48] and the Betfred Challenge Cup Final [36].
https://wiganwarriors.com/blog/2024/11/ ... le-charts/
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2021 10:17 am
Re: Ellis and O’Neill top tackle charts
Well done ! Ps doesn't arithmetic averages seem illogical. ?josie andrews wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 3:52 pm KAIDE ELLIS TOPPED THE BETFRED SUPER LEAGUE TACKLE CHARTS FOR WIGAN WARRIORS WHILST BRAD O’NEILL AVERAGED THE HIGHEST PER GAME.
The Warriors completed 8,391 tackles throughout the Betfred Super League season – play-offs included – as Matt Peet’s side finished the campaign with the second fewest tackles missed [788].
Ellis recorded the most tackles in league action with 761 and a 29.27 average per game. The loose forward’s highest figure came in the Betfred Super League Grand Final [56] as well as Round 5 and Round 6 matches against Salford Red Devils [46] and St Helens [47].
Luke Thompson closely followed with 751 completed tackles with an average 27.81 per match. The England international produced huge numbers in victories against Hull KR in Round 25 [45] and the Grand Final [48].
Liam Farrell recorded 699 tackles with an average 29.13 per game, whilst England internationals Ethan Havard and Junior Nsemba averaged 28.33 and 23.75 tackles per game after completing 595 and 570.
O’Neill averaged the highest tackles per game [30.29] for the Warriors in the competition. The hooker, who suffered a season-ending ACL injury in July, also completed the most Warriors tackles in the Betfred World Club Challenge [48] and the Betfred Challenge Cup Final [36].
https://wiganwarriors.com/blog/2024/11/ ... le-charts/
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2021 10:17 am
Re: Ellis and O’Neill top tackle charts
Oh dear- No response so I thought about it. This is the result:archiekeith wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 10:58 amWell done ! Ps doesn't arithmetic averages seem illogical. ?josie andrews wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 3:52 pm KAIDE ELLIS TOPPED THE BETFRED SUPER LEAGUE TACKLE CHARTS FOR WIGAN WARRIORS WHILST BRAD O’NEILL AVERAGED THE HIGHEST PER GAME.
The Warriors completed 8,391 tackles throughout the Betfred Super League season – play-offs included – as Matt Peet’s side finished the campaign with the second fewest tackles missed [788].
Ellis recorded the most tackles in league action with 761 and a 29.27 average per game. The loose forward’s highest figure came in the Betfred Super League Grand Final [56] as well as Round 5 and Round 6 matches against Salford Red Devils [46] and St Helens [47].
Luke Thompson closely followed with 751 completed tackles with an average 27.81 per match. The England international produced huge numbers in victories against Hull KR in Round 25 [45] and the Grand Final [48].
Liam Farrell recorded 699 tackles with an average 29.13 per game, whilst England internationals Ethan Havard and Junior Nsemba averaged 28.33 and 23.75 tackles per game after completing 595 and 570.
O’Neill averaged the highest tackles per game [30.29] for the Warriors in the competition. The hooker, who suffered a season-ending ACL injury in July, also completed the most Warriors tackles in the Betfred World Club Challenge [48] and the Betfred Challenge Cup Final [36].
https://wiganwarriors.com/blog/2024/11/ ... le-charts/![]()
It's use in an arithmetical Calculus is OK however it's use in an empirical proposition does appear illogical. One can't complete a Non Cardinal numbered tackle count eg. Completing 30.29 tackles per game. Its not possible

Re: Ellis and O’Neill top tackle charts
Surely the 0.29 of a tackle is when they join in as 3rd or 4th manarchiekeith wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:43 am
Oh dear- No response so I thought about it. This is the result:
It's use in an arithmetical Calculus is OK however it's use in an empirical proposition does appear illogical. One can't complete a Non Cardinal numbered tackle count eg. Completing 30.29 tackles per game. Its not possible![]()

There are 10 types of people, those who get binary and those who dont!
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2021 10:17 am
Re: Ellis and O’Neill top tackle charts
can't argue with thatL JLazy J wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 12:21 pmSurely the 0.29 of a tackle is when they join in as 3rd or 4th manarchiekeith wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:43 am
Oh dear- No response so I thought about it. This is the result:
It's use in an arithmetical Calculus is OK however it's use in an empirical proposition does appear illogical. One can't complete a Non Cardinal numbered tackle count eg. Completing 30.29 tackles per game. Its not possible![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Re: Ellis and O’Neill top tackle charts
Must be the off seasonarchiekeith wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 12:38 pmcan't argue with thatL JLazy J wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 12:21 pmSurely the 0.29 of a tackle is when they join in as 3rd or 4th manarchiekeith wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:43 am
Oh dear- No response so I thought about it. This is the result:
It's use in an arithmetical Calculus is OK however it's use in an empirical proposition does appear illogical. One can't complete a Non Cardinal numbered tackle count eg. Completing 30.29 tackles per game. Its not possible![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

-
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 2:13 pm
Re: Ellis and O’Neill top tackle charts
No.archiekeith wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 10:58 amWell done ! Ps doesn't arithmetic averages seem illogical. ?josie andrews wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 3:52 pm KAIDE ELLIS TOPPED THE BETFRED SUPER LEAGUE TACKLE CHARTS FOR WIGAN WARRIORS WHILST BRAD O’NEILL AVERAGED THE HIGHEST PER GAME.
The Warriors completed 8,391 tackles throughout the Betfred Super League season – play-offs included – as Matt Peet’s side finished the campaign with the second fewest tackles missed [788].
Ellis recorded the most tackles in league action with 761 and a 29.27 average per game. The loose forward’s highest figure came in the Betfred Super League Grand Final [56] as well as Round 5 and Round 6 matches against Salford Red Devils [46] and St Helens [47].
Luke Thompson closely followed with 751 completed tackles with an average 27.81 per match. The England international produced huge numbers in victories against Hull KR in Round 25 [45] and the Grand Final [48].
Liam Farrell recorded 699 tackles with an average 29.13 per game, whilst England internationals Ethan Havard and Junior Nsemba averaged 28.33 and 23.75 tackles per game after completing 595 and 570.
O’Neill averaged the highest tackles per game [30.29] for the Warriors in the competition. The hooker, who suffered a season-ending ACL injury in July, also completed the most Warriors tackles in the Betfred World Club Challenge [48] and the Betfred Challenge Cup Final [36].
https://wiganwarriors.com/blog/2024/11/ ... le-charts/![]()

Re: Ellis and O’Neill top tackle charts
Of course not.
Re: Ellis and O’Neill top tackle charts
You want the median then.archiekeith wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:43 amOh dear- No response so I thought about it. This is the result:archiekeith wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2024 10:58 amWell done ! Ps doesn't arithmetic averages seem illogical. ?josie andrews wrote: ↑Mon Nov 11, 2024 3:52 pm KAIDE ELLIS TOPPED THE BETFRED SUPER LEAGUE TACKLE CHARTS FOR WIGAN WARRIORS WHILST BRAD O’NEILL AVERAGED THE HIGHEST PER GAME.
The Warriors completed 8,391 tackles throughout the Betfred Super League season – play-offs included – as Matt Peet’s side finished the campaign with the second fewest tackles missed [788].
Ellis recorded the most tackles in league action with 761 and a 29.27 average per game. The loose forward’s highest figure came in the Betfred Super League Grand Final [56] as well as Round 5 and Round 6 matches against Salford Red Devils [46] and St Helens [47].
Luke Thompson closely followed with 751 completed tackles with an average 27.81 per match. The England international produced huge numbers in victories against Hull KR in Round 25 [45] and the Grand Final [48].
Liam Farrell recorded 699 tackles with an average 29.13 per game, whilst England internationals Ethan Havard and Junior Nsemba averaged 28.33 and 23.75 tackles per game after completing 595 and 570.
O’Neill averaged the highest tackles per game [30.29] for the Warriors in the competition. The hooker, who suffered a season-ending ACL injury in July, also completed the most Warriors tackles in the Betfred World Club Challenge [48] and the Betfred Challenge Cup Final [36].
https://wiganwarriors.com/blog/2024/11/ ... le-charts/![]()
It's use in an arithmetical Calculus is OK however it's use in an empirical proposition does appear illogical. One can't complete a Non Cardinal numbered tackle count eg. Completing 30.29 tackles per game. Its not possible![]()
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2021 10:17 am
Re: Ellis and O’Neill top tackle charts
Yes Mike but even that should bexpressed as such in an empirical proposition of the type stated in JA 's post re this subjectIn fact
the proposition without the reference to "tackle " tackle : being emipical and the median similar to average both used in and exist so to speak in a cardinal number Calculus. But remember I'm a person one poster said he should not listen to expressed in language he couldn't state on this forum. I think he meant "idiot"

the proposition without the reference to "tackle " tackle : being emipical and the median similar to average both used in and exist so to speak in a cardinal number Calculus. But remember I'm a person one poster said he should not listen to expressed in language he couldn't state on this forum. I think he meant "idiot"

