Wigan Warriors boss Matt Peet calls for changes in the Super League salary cap

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
WarriorWinger
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2019 4:32 pm

Re: Wigan Warriors boss Matt Peet calls for changes in the Super League salary cap

Post by WarriorWinger »

Mike wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:48 pm
WarriorWinger wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:05 pm Its a vicious circle, investors and advertisers want value for money, and without the exposure and promotion of the game why should someone want to invest, and without the investment it's hard to promote the game.
I don't get why people are still suggesting running a RL team is an investment. No-one makes money running a RL team. You're in it to lose as little money as possible whilst supporting the team you're interested in.

Advertisers on the other hand do have to worry about exposure and value for money etc.
I'm referring to those who 'invest' their money into something to get a return (a bit like shareholders), not those who invest in a club for the love of the club, so it will be almost like a 'loan' to the club, the risk to the investor is if the club goes completely bust but the club eventually have to pay the investor back with interest.
Shevvylad
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2020 7:17 pm

Re: Wigan Warriors boss Matt Peet calls for changes in the Super League salary cap

Post by Shevvylad »

If we are going to have the nonsense of a salary cap, and pretend that it wasn't introduced by jealous Yorkshire administrators wanting to bring Wigan down, then it should be a fixed percentage of a club's turnover, Say, 40% of the previous years turnover. Clubs would then be protected from themselves ( a pathetic condescension in my view, but that's just my opinion ) but crucially would have the incentive to grow, attract further investment, and compete with the likes of RU.
mickali1
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:55 pm

Re: Wigan Warriors boss Matt Peet calls for changes in the Super League salary cap

Post by mickali1 »

Shevvylad wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2025 10:06 am If we are going to have the nonsense of a salary cap, and pretend that it wasn't introduced by jealous Yorkshire administrators wanting to bring Wigan down, then it should be a fixed percentage of a club's turnover, Say, 40% of the previous years turnover. Clubs would then be protected from themselves ( a pathetic condescension in my view, but that's just my opinion ) but crucially would have the incentive to grow, attract further investment, and compete with the likes of RU.
Spot on.
User avatar
Mike
Site Admin
Posts: 7978
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 6:54 pm
Contact:

Re: Wigan Warriors boss Matt Peet calls for changes in the Super League salary cap

Post by Mike »

WarriorWinger wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:52 am
Mike wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:48 pm
WarriorWinger wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:05 pm Its a vicious circle, investors and advertisers want value for money, and without the exposure and promotion of the game why should someone want to invest, and without the investment it's hard to promote the game.
I don't get why people are still suggesting running a RL team is an investment. No-one makes money running a RL team. You're in it to lose as little money as possible whilst supporting the team you're interested in.

Advertisers on the other hand do have to worry about exposure and value for money etc.
I'm referring to those who 'invest' their money into something to get a return (a bit like shareholders), not those who invest in a club for the love of the club, so it will be almost like a 'loan' to the club, the risk to the investor is if the club goes completely bust but the club eventually have to pay the investor back with interest.
If eventually is never, then you are right! I would expect most of the "loans" are eventually written off.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
🏆🏆🏆🏆
WarriorWinger
Posts: 468
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2019 4:32 pm

Re: Wigan Warriors boss Matt Peet calls for changes in the Super League salary cap

Post by WarriorWinger »

Mike wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:44 pm
WarriorWinger wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:52 am
Mike wrote: Thu Jan 16, 2025 4:48 pm

I don't get why people are still suggesting running a RL team is an investment. No-one makes money running a RL team. You're in it to lose as little money as possible whilst supporting the team you're interested in.

Advertisers on the other hand do have to worry about exposure and value for money etc.
I'm referring to those who 'invest' their money into something to get a return (a bit like shareholders), not those who invest in a club for the love of the club, so it will be almost like a 'loan' to the club, the risk to the investor is if the club goes completely bust but the club eventually have to pay the investor back with interest.
If eventually is never, then you are right! I would expect most of the "loans" are eventually written off.
I suspect most are written off, especially the Director loans, didn't Uncle Mo and Whelan both write off their 'loans' when departing the club (I can't remember now), however Salford need investors and if they cannot find those who have a love of the club then they will be looking for purely monetary investors, who will expect a return at some point.
morley pie eater
Posts: 3579
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:01 pm

Re: Wigan Warriors boss Matt Peet calls for changes in the Super League salary cap

Post by morley pie eater »

WarriorWinger wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 12:46 pm
Mike wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:44 pm
WarriorWinger wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2025 9:52 am

I'm referring to those who 'invest' their money into something to get a return (a bit like shareholders), not those who invest in a club for the love of the club, so it will be almost like a 'loan' to the club, the risk to the investor is if the club goes completely bust but the club eventually have to pay the investor back with interest.
If eventually is never, then you are right! I would expect most of the "loans" are eventually written off.
I suspect most are written off, especially the Director loans, didn't Uncle Mo and Whelan both write off their 'loans' when departing the club (I can't remember now), however Salford need investors and if they cannot find those who have a love of the club then they will be looking for purely monetary investors, who will expect a return at some point.
If Whelan wrote off his loans, what happened to the £millions from Tesco for Central Park? Did it all go towards the new stadium?
Wigan ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Saints ⭐⭐⭐
fozzie58
Posts: 947
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2024 10:47 pm

Re: Wigan Warriors boss Matt Peet calls for changes in the Super League salary cap

Post by fozzie58 »

morley pie eater wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 8:18 pm
WarriorWinger wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 12:46 pm
Mike wrote: Fri Jan 17, 2025 6:44 pm

If eventually is never, then you are right! I would expect most of the "loans" are eventually written off.
I suspect most are written off, especially the Director loans, didn't Uncle Mo and Whelan both write off their 'loans' when departing the club (I can't remember now), however Salford need investors and if they cannot find those who have a love of the club then they will be looking for purely monetary investors, who will expect a return at some point.
If Whelan wrote off his loans, what happened to the £millions from Tesco for Central Park? Did it all go towards the new stadium?
he would need all the cash he had for brasso to keep his cup final medal clean wouldn’t he? :lol:
The artist formally known as fozziekskem
the pieman
Posts: 1755
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 5:34 pm

Re: Wigan Warriors boss Matt Peet calls for changes in the Super League salary cap

Post by the pieman »

fozzie58 wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 9:02 pm
morley pie eater wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 8:18 pm
WarriorWinger wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2025 12:46 pm

I suspect most are written off, especially the Director loans, didn't Uncle Mo and Whelan both write off their 'loans' when departing the club (I can't remember now), however Salford need investors and if they cannot find those who have a love of the club then they will be looking for purely monetary investors, who will expect a return at some point.
If Whelan wrote off his loans, what happened to the £millions from Tesco for Central Park? Did it all go towards the new stadium?
he would need all the cash he had for brasso to keep his cup final medal clean wouldn’t he? :lol:
:) :) :)

Did he win a medal and break his leg by any chance :) :) i've never heard that one
Post Reply