Re: Hock Gone?

GeoffN · Post by **GeoffN** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:45 pm

The_Bad_Guy posted:
edited by Mike to aviod any legal issues - sorry

This would be the same psycho who was saying (sorry, I mean shouting) earlier that Millward had been sacked.

mrs_carney · Post by **mrs_carney** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:47 pm

To be fair, i've known this for a while, just didnt post it incase it wasnt true!! But you know, some people dont think like that obviously. Lets hope he doesnt sack the others because then we are VERY screwed!

mrs_carney · Post by **mrs_carney** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:51 pm

Yeah, no point explaining the whole story until its confirmed as it could be a vicious rumour, in which case you know, nothing should of been posted. But just a warning, if the other 2 who are with hock on this ( as i've heard) we really are going to be stuck unless we can get their replacements in this season as we have NO cover!!

cpwigan · Post by **cpwigan** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:58 pm

So Hock gone, what a tragedy (mind you he was a problem from his teenage years). Fantastic talent and your suggesting we may lose 2 or 4 more players?

cpwigan · Post by **cpwigan** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:08 pm

I just got banned from RLFans.com for asking if the rumour that Gareth Hock had been fired was true

TRICKY DICKY · Post by **TRICKY DICKY** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:10 pm

You should have read the sticky at the top of the page.

Its mighty delicate at the moment.

This subject is libellous if not true.

It is serious with major concequences.

stevethered · Post by **stevethered** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:15 pm

TRICKY DICKY posted:
You should have read the sticky at the top of the page.

Its mighty delicate at the moment.

This subject is libellous if not true.

It is serious with major concequences.

i agree i hope for hocks sake this isnt true, and not fair to say anything until anything is announced in media, professional sports people have to take 2 tests he may have 1 test but doesnt make if accurate until the same test is repeated innocent until to then so not fair to spread rumours.

mike binder · Post by **mike binder** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:18 pm

heard the RUMOUR FOR A WHILE THINK THIS STORY SHOULD GET BLOCKED AS YOU MAY GET IN SERIOUS TROUBLE IF NOT TRUE

AncientAndLoyal · Post by **AncientAndLoyal** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:18 pm

Personally on RL fans i think there is too much censorship, i mean.... its well known that it is on the cards for this..

I have mixed feelings to be honest, letting Hock go wouldnt be a major blow as we havent had him for two years so my feeling is you cant miss what you havent had.. but if the others are who i think they are, then they are in integral positions, even though they may not be performing as none of the team really are, we have little or no cover... and certainly no quality cover.... so Hock is a good think IMO if true, the others i would keep, but its unlikely wigan can get rid of 1 and keep the others

mrs_carney · Post by **mrs_carney** » Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:20 pm

agree with tricky and binder. Theres a reason i said nothing all those weeks ago!!