Terry Newton against Stains

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
jinkin jimmy
Posts: 3610
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:55 pm

Re: Terry Newton against S...

Post by jinkin jimmy »

- psycho - posted:
#1 warrior princess posted:
Yes I agree, we should start a we love terry newton fan club so Maurice may get the right idea and get him back super quick.
and that will help mickey higham's confidence wont it! :conf:
If any player has a doubt about his confidence they would be well advised to stay away from places like this.

FWIW I thought Newton had an excellent game last night - did he give a single penalty away? I am not joining the "Bring Terry Back" brigade because what's gone is gone. However, anyone who thinks either of our 2 hookers can perform like that wants their head examining.
User avatar
armyXIII
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 7:41 pm

Re: Terry Newton against S...

Post by armyXIII »

Great game. Shame about another poo(r) refereeing performance again.Playing out to the flanks where the Saints halves are always loitering away from the work - not brain surgery is it, just effective...
Strength by superior fire power...
GeoffN
Posts: 12559
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: Terry Newton against S...

Post by GeoffN »

I didn't think the ref was that bad - pedantic & fussy, maybe, but most of the penalties really couldn't have been ignored - I can understand refs being lenient with "technical" offences like PTBs, but most were for high shots, which IMO should always be penalised.
User avatar
chrisJJ
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:17 pm

Re: Terry Newton against S...

Post by chrisJJ »

NO

Firstly for The bulls he's no. 13. Cunningham is much better (please don't hate me) and well higham and Godwin aren't that bad actually Higham is a test star and Godwin is Fantastic.

Newton has moved on so why can't we?
To be the best
you have to beat the best
GeoffN
Posts: 12559
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: Terry Newton against S...

Post by GeoffN »

chrisJJ posted:
NO

Firstly for The bulls he's no. 13. Cunningham is much better (please don't hate me) and well higham and Godwin aren't that bad actually Higham is a test star and Godwin is Fantastic.

Newton has moved on so why can't we?
He's only #13 because Henderson was already in possession of the #9 shirt - the #13 shirt was vacated by Ben Harris when he moved to centre this season, and Langley wanted to keep #19 when he moved to loose forward.
- psycho -
Posts: 4711
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:08 pm

Re: Terry Newton against S...

Post by - psycho - »

but langley is #16 isnt he geoff?
"what ever happens... we stick together... we stay together... we survive."

-------------------------------------
GeoffN
Posts: 12559
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: Terry Newton against S...

Post by GeoffN »

- psycho - posted:
but langley is #16 isnt he geoff?
OOPs! Yep...keep getting those 6's and 9's mixed up!
Same applies though, I meant he didn't want the 13 shirt when he changed to loose forward.
Post Reply