Video Ref
Re: Video Ref
York, actually.Jake posted:
Once again we are being killed by the video ref, I bet Jerry Kershaw has got a Wakefield post code.
Mind you, it's far from the first time he's robbed us.
Fortunately, it didn't affect the result.
-
- Posts: 14398
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:33 pm
- Location: Howe Bridge
- Contact:
Re: Video Ref
Just sen the match replay on SKY +... the first try was not 'benefit of the doubt'... no way... the second, WAS a penalty try... sadly. dobsons hand did come down but not deliberately...
2 points anyways
2 points anyways
https://www.ancientandloyal.com/
James Slevin
Ces Mountford
And the “kind of rugby player you’d want to be in your dreams” James Leytham
Should be in the Wigan Warriors Hall
Of Fame
James Slevin
Ces Mountford
And the “kind of rugby player you’d want to be in your dreams” James Leytham
Should be in the Wigan Warriors Hall
Of Fame
Re: Video Ref
what is wrong with fans theses days?first we say all matches should have them, because the video can't lie but when it suits us they are wrong. ima they should ALL or none no half way :conf:
Re: Video Ref
If it was not deliberate it was not a penalty try otherwise we should have had one at Wakefield to win us the game.ancientnloyal posted:
Just sen the match replay on SKY +... the first try was not 'benefit of the doubt'... no way... the second, WAS a penalty try... sadly. dobsons hand did come down but not deliberately...
What is more for a penalty try to be given you have to be fouled in the act of scoring a try. As the Quins player was short of the line that can't be the case. There was no way he was going over the line or reaching out to put the ball down.
If the video ref decided Dobson was deliberate in his action then given where the Quins player was it should simply have been a penalty, not a penalty try.
Over on rlfans I think it is pie eyed who has the scanner/refs call thing and his reporitng of what was said makes interesting reading. In a nutshell the ref and touch judges could not understand how he gave the decision which begs the question if the ref didn't think it was a try why go to the video ref in the first place?
Dave
- #1 warrior princess
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 10:36 pm
Re: Video Ref
Kershaw was blind as a bat yesterday!
You can take the girl out of Wigan, but you can't take Wigan out of the girl!
Re: Video Ref
The more I watch these video decisions the more I'm convinced the officials first thought is "what are the implications of my decision" rather than "what is the correct decision".
Strongest Armpits in Rugby League
Re: Video Ref
Both = no try, Simple as that, The sad part about it is if come the end of the season and it comes down to points difference? Well need i say more.
Re: Video Ref
Even Tony Rea admits they should never have been given.
"Even Quins coach Tony Rea was shaking his head.
"I can't believe it. I don't know where they get these calls from."
from:
http://www.wigantoday.net/ViewArticle2. ... ID=1603591
"Even Quins coach Tony Rea was shaking his head.
"I can't believe it. I don't know where they get these calls from."
from:
http://www.wigantoday.net/ViewArticle2. ... ID=1603591
Re: Video Ref
We watched the replay yesterday. When they scored them tries (that wre not tries) stevo said for the first try the video ref will give a benifit of the doubt and next minute on the big screen it came up as benifit of the doubt, same again for the plenty try.
xxxxxxx Warriors 2008 xxxxxx
ooooooooooooo were the greatest club in the world
we've got barrett n kenny
edwards n hanley
boston n kevin iroooooo
ooooooooooooo were the greatest club in the world
we've got barrett n kenny
edwards n hanley
boston n kevin iroooooo