
Sean O' Loughlin
Re: Sean O' Loughlin
sell him he is crap, lets get Stanley Gene , he is way better player

Re: Sean O' Loughlin
Well said, i couldn't agree more. The bloke's absolutely useless. You guys that think he's great at tacklin must be watchin a different game to me cos he's forever going in wi high tackles, knockin on or just passing the ball to the opposition. He must be well up there wi players givin away penalties!Bear posted:
We have this convo time after time after time
Sell Lockers and give the captaincy to Fletcher or Fielden
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 1:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Sean O' Loughlin
Someone Block any posts of the sort now ITS JUST BORING

OOOOOO were the greatest club in the world!!!!
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 1:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Sean O' Loughlin
I disagree
If people want to continue talking about a player so be it. You will find most discussions go round in circles, if you don’t want to read about it anymore then do just that.
Keep off the thread!
If people want to continue talking about a player so be it. You will find most discussions go round in circles, if you don’t want to read about it anymore then do just that.
Keep off the thread!
Re: Sean O' Loughlin
Maybe I should create a sticky "Sean O'Loughlin - discuss" thread, to save the creation of a new thread every week saying exactly the same things. And another one for "Referees - good or bad", and maybe a "I've now got this many 10's/100's/1000's of messages on here" thread as well...Flash posted:I have no problem with that. My suggestion is in line with the rules of the site. I am merely suggesting that they resurrect one of the many already existing threads rather than starting a new one every time, so that all our views can be included without us having to type them out all over again. Common sense really. I thought you were a great advocate of common sense WW.....Wigan Watcher posted:
I disagree
If people want to continue talking about a player so be it. You will find most discussions go round in circles, if you don’t want to read about it anymore then do just that.
Keep off the thread!
http://fraggle.fotopic.net
"You rescue me, you are my faith, my hope, my liberty.
And when there's darkness all around, you shine bright for me, you are a guiding light to me....
You are a Tower of Strength to me" - Wayne Hussey, The Mission.
Shepherd's Bush Empire - 27/Feb/08 - 1/Mar/08
[hr]
"You rescue me, you are my faith, my hope, my liberty.
And when there's darkness all around, you shine bright for me, you are a guiding light to me....
You are a Tower of Strength to me" - Wayne Hussey, The Mission.
Shepherd's Bush Empire - 27/Feb/08 - 1/Mar/08
[hr]
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 1:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Sean O' Loughlin
Flash posted:I have no problem with that. My suggestion is in line with the rules of the site. I am merely suggesting that they resurrect one of the many already existing threads rather than starting a new one every time, so that all our views can be included without us having to type them out all over again. Common sense really. I thought you were a great advocate of common sense WW.....Wigan Watcher posted:
I disagree
If people want to continue talking about a player so be it. You will find most discussions go round in circles, if you don’t want to read about it anymore then do just that.
Keep off the thread!
Fair point but some people don’t know that there is a previous thread as it is not showing on the front page of topics. It would mean looking back every time someone wanted to post something new.
To be fair no harm is being done and if you have had your say so to speak then simply don’t comment any more on the issue.
Plenty of common sense here Flash
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 1:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Sean O' Loughlin
Go for it FraggleFraggle posted:Maybe I should create a sticky "Sean O'Loughlin - discuss" thread, to save the creation of a new thread every week saying exactly the same things. And another one for "Referees - good or bad", and maybe a "I've now got this many 10's/100's/1000's of messages on here" thread as well...Flash posted:I have no problem with that. My suggestion is in line with the rules of the site. I am merely suggesting that they resurrect one of the many already existing threads rather than starting a new one every time, so that all our views can be included without us having to type them out all over again. Common sense really. I thought you were a great advocate of common sense WW.....Wigan Watcher posted:
I disagree
If people want to continue talking about a player so be it. You will find most discussions go round in circles, if you don’t want to read about it anymore then do just that.
Keep off the thread!
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 1:53 pm
- Contact:
Re: Sean O' Loughlin
come on Flash respond to this for your 1000 post.
Did Lockers play well through your rose tinted (joke)
Did Lockers play well through your rose tinted (joke)
Re: Sean O' Loughlin
lets face it he is an overated never has been
, if he had been around during the glory years, lets face it he would have been playing at bradford northern or oldam or somewhere, lets get players who actualy are phenomenal playmakers. not someone who makes 30+ suspect tackles and gives away to many penaltys, come on Nobby bring us Stanley and millard :eusa10: :eusa2: :devi:
