M.O.M????

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
User avatar
XxX_Wigan_Til_I_Die_XxX
Posts: 251
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:37 am

M.O.M????

Post by XxX_Wigan_Til_I_Die_XxX »

can someone please tell me who the man of the match was tonight? thanks x
...*...[..e..m..m..a..]...*...
User avatar
jaws1
Posts: 3211
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:43 pm
Contact:

Re: M.O.M????

Post by jaws1 »

Danny Orr
User avatar
XxX_Wigan_Til_I_Die_XxX
Posts: 251
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 11:37 am

Re: M.O.M????

Post by XxX_Wigan_Til_I_Die_XxX »

thanks mate :wink: i know this is off topic but in case anyone is wondering, pete has won BB lol
...*...[..e..m..m..a..]...*...
User avatar
taskmaster
Posts: 199
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 5:14 pm

Re: M.O.M????

Post by taskmaster »

so what wigan won bigger and better news
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: M.O.M????

Post by cpwigan »

Very hard to pick a MOM. Danny scoring was huge. Lockers was solid and made few if any mistakes and I think Fletch was reasonably good. So so many mistakes though in very difficult conditions.

Somebody needs to have a quiet word in Hocks ear too. Second match in succession hes tried something daft when we just need the stick it up your jumper routine.
Leyther Pie
Posts: 870
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:25 am

Re: M.O.M????

Post by Leyther Pie »

On rdio it said that fletch had a huge game in terms of taking the initiative. He was their MOM
I've never felt more like singing the Blues
When the Wiganers win and the Leythers lose.
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: M.O.M????

Post by cpwigan »

Fletch has huge potential and I think we will see him become better and better next season. He has a really good passing game going toward the defensive line.
User avatar
Fielden's Angel
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 8:33 pm

Re: M.O.M????

Post by Fielden's Angel »

I was surprised by O loughlin he actually played good tonight. Disappointed with Hock some silly mistakes although he defended well. Orr definately deserves MOM he was outstanding, espicially covering for Valeleki ( again!). Fletcher, Ashton and Calderwood also played fantastic. Fielden seems a little bit off but it could be down to the injury he sustained a few weeks ago ( dont worry Stu im still your angel :wink: ).
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: M.O.M????

Post by cpwigan »

Not sure we have got used to Fielden yet. He does not run simple straight lines so I think he's having to wait for passes too long because our hookers are not used to him. His defence is awesome.
User avatar
Likely_Lad
Posts: 313
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:31 pm

Re: M.O.M????

Post by Likely_Lad »

Fielden's Angel posted:
I was surprised by O loughlin he actually played good tonight. Disappointed with Hock some silly mistakes although he defended well. Orr definately deserves MOM he was outstanding, espicially covering for Valeleki ( again!). Fletcher, Ashton and Calderwood also played fantastic. Fielden seems a little bit off but it could be down to the injury he sustained a few weeks ago ( dont worry Stu im still your angel :wink: ).
How? IMO he was pretty ordinary. I thought it said Hanson was MOM? I'd have given it to Lockers I think but I felt Godwin did well when he came on. The forwards in general though were fairly poor and Orr had a decent game, whereas Dobbo was pretty crap tbh.
The poster formerly knows as Wizard_Millward.

I wasn't as fit or strong as before but my two biggest muscles still worked - my heart and my head - Kris Radlinski.
Post Reply