Page 2 of 3
Re: SKY SPORTS BIASED?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 6:39 pm
by jammie
perhaps stevo is a good mate as well,he might go for stains coach when anderson leaves,we stand no chance then becuase he thinks he knows everything

he should be on a plane back to oz with his pension book
Re: SKY SPORTS BIASED?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 6:45 pm
by - psycho -
hanley :conf:
Re: SKY SPORTS BIASED?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 6:53 pm
by First Try Tickle
I wonder if enough fans email in the sky might give us the sound options that footy have.
Id sooner listed to a fan of each team, or even just the crowd noise than the 2 idiots.
But why do we have to give the couple of stains fans a microphone each as well.
Re: SKY SPORTS BIASED?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 7:00 pm
by thegimble
The point which really proved how biased Stevo is happened on Richards Try.
After watching it 2-3 ties he said the defender should have had the benefit of the doubt re grounding. Now the rule is the attacking side gets the benefit of the doubt not the defending. The defender never had control on grounding as the ball was rolling as he touched it.
Also the bit where Wellens beat 1 man Stevo got carried away that he was 12-1 for Man of Steel and Barrett was ridiculos to be 1-8. He was going to put a 20 Quid on it. Wellens was nothing more than average all night. Though Barrett was quite his kicks made 2 tries.
Its time for Sky to realise that Stevo is now deliberatly trying to be contreversial and that he needs to go and do primary school biology to learn where the shoulder is.
Also the harping on
Re: SKY SPORTS BIASED?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 7:04 pm
by - psycho -
think his exact words were
"this man (wellens) is 12-1 for man of steel. trent barret, 8-1, i mean come on!"
idiot.
Re: SKY SPORTS BIASED?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:20 pm
by gpartin
First Try Tickle posted:
But why do we have to give the couple of stains fans a microphone each as well.
You'd only hear the phlegm, it would be impossible to understand

Re: SKY SPORTS BIASED?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:54 pm
by cpwigan
Stevo hates all things Wigan. He went to play for Penrith in Australia in the early 70's. They signed Bill Ashurst too. Why/How nobody really knows BUT Stevo and Bill hated each other and it ended with Bill regularly beating Stevo up because Stevo deliberately refused to pass to him during the matches.
Re: SKY SPORTS BIASED?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 10:59 pm
by - psycho -
didn't beat him hard enough.
Re: SKY SPORTS BIASED?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 11:26 pm
by butt monkey
I stopped watching boot n all or whatever it's called 2 years ago. The "topics" were so repetitive, seen them every year since SKY nicked Rugby League off BSB.
Don't have much time for the "Live" matches either. Too boring or one sided (same thing really), Only watch he odd matches, the overall package is just lame.
Re: SKY SPORTS BIASED?
Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 11:43 pm
by simmy1
i have emailed boots and all on number of occasions last time when they all slated wigan for breach of scap they def hate wigan for what ever reasons only good opinon was robbie pauls but dumber and dumber should leave the commentry to thoses who know what they are talikng about ,wigan could have beaten saints 100-0 and we would have been lucky but if other way round it would have been a champions performance ,i think its time they both went and took phil clarke with them i always watch the games with sound off and radio commentry much better