Tomkins
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Tomkins
He was injured against Catalan. He was hoping to be fit but did not recover in time. Following his injury he was given a 2-4 week recovery period. I can tell you that he was not a happy bunny on Friday night. He was a major loss and in my view we would have won had he played.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:20 pm
Re: Tomkins
No one liked Fielden especially Mcilorum and Hock, and he is gone and if it is trye about Finch he is also going so hopefully peace and harmony will return :conf:
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Tomkins
Not true but even if it was then Waney would not have dropped anyone or he would now be looking for a new job!Warriors Forever wrote:People will have a go at me here, thats why i put it on the rumour mill, anyway here goes... i have it from a very reliable mate who knows a few rugby players and Tomkins apparently got dropped for fighting with Finch, Wane and players broke it up on Monday but Tomkins carried it on and was therefore punished with being dropped from the side.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Tomkins
If I was coach then I wouldn't want peace and harmony. I would want players that would have a go at others that are not pulling their weight.Warriors Forever wrote:No one liked Fielden especially Mcilorum and Hock, and he is gone and if it is trye about Finch he is also going so hopefully peace and harmony will return :conf:
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:20 pm
Re: Tomkins
Going too far in training will affect performances on the pitch , Good team spirit is what is needed and all you have to do is look over the pennines to realise that
-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Tomkins
Would SW not want to try and keep Tomkins injury hush hush from Brian McDermott WF ?Warriors Forever wrote:Well exactly just seems strange that no injury was announced until 6pm
Re: Tomkins
The injury was made public the moment the squad was announced containing Jack Murphy.Panchitta Marra wrote:Would SW not want to try and keep Tomkins injury hush hush from Brian McDermott WF ?Warriors Forever wrote:Well exactly just seems strange that no injury was announced until 6pm
-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Tomkins
Thats a fair comment.cpwigan wrote:The injury was made public the moment the squad was announced containing Jack Murphy.Panchitta Marra wrote:Would SW not want to try and keep Tomkins injury hush hush from Brian McDermott WF ?Warriors Forever wrote:Well exactly just seems strange that no injury was announced until 6pm
Do you think that Sam Tomkins was in the squad but not playing because of injury or because of fighting with Brett Finch ?
Re: Tomkins
Even if there had been a scuffle, do you think that Wane would have dropped the most lethal attacking threat in British RL, and gone with a half back who, whilst vastly experienced hasn't been consistently outstanding throughout the season? Instead of giving them both a bollocking and telling them to just get on with it?Panchitta Marra wrote:Thats a fair comment.cpwigan wrote:The injury was made public the moment the squad was announced containing Jack Murphy.Panchitta Marra wrote: Would SW not want to try and keep Tomkins injury hush hush from Brian McDermott WF ?
Do you think that Sam Tomkins was in the squad but not playing because of injury or because of fighting with Brett Finch ?
Personally, I agree with the claim that Tomkins was injured, there can be no other (sensible) reason at all, as to why he didn't play.
-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Tomkins
Personally I think that Sam was injured, however, just asking the question of someone who appers in the know of his opinion.Sutty wrote:Even if there had been a scuffle, do you think that Wane would have dropped the most lethal attacking threat in British RL, and gone with a half back who, whilst vastly experienced hasn't been consistently outstanding throughout the season? Instead of giving them both a bollocking and telling them to just get on with it?Panchitta Marra wrote:Thats a fair comment.cpwigan wrote: The injury was made public the moment the squad was announced containing Jack Murphy.
Do you think that Sam Tomkins was in the squad but not playing because of injury or because of fighting with Brett Finch ?
Personally, I agree with the claim that Tomkins was injured, there can be no other (sensible) reason at all, as to why he didn't play.