Page 2 of 18
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:28 pm
by medlocke
Complete and utter SH!TE :exc:
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:32 pm
by Firestarter
Injuries or not.Against Wakefield this result is not acceptable.clubb,Powell,mossop,Tomkins,isa and Sutton is not a bad starting pack(on paper)
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:32 pm
by cpwigan
We could be nilled here. Unacceptable no matter what team we put out. Wane seems incapable of coaching unless all the dices are loaded in his favour and the best XVII is playing.
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:34 pm
by butt monkey
If I had a choice on selection Mossop would never be in my side. Too easily taken down, poor hands and doesn't hurt going into tackles.
Isa is not fit and I always think Clubb is far better coming off the bench than starting but hey I am only a fan, what do I know?
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:37 pm
by cpwigan
50-0 ???
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:38 pm
by cpwigan
Why can Wane not adapt. You know you are with a weakened team, you play a different game plan.
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:38 pm
by adiddy
Firestarter wrote:Injuries or not.Against Wakefield this result is not acceptable.clubb,Powell,mossop,Tomkins,isa and Sutton is not a bad starting pack(on paper)
Agree!! Embarrassed!!
Matt
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:39 pm
by butt monkey
Nope 56-0
We are lucky to be nil
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:39 pm
by DaveO
cpwigan wrote:Why can Wane not adapt. You know you are with a weakened team, you play a different game plan.
Because he is a crap coach?
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 5:40 pm
by jaws1
60 =nil