Page 2 of 3

Re: ganson and laughton

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:46 pm
by Wigan Watcher
jinkin jimmy posted:
Wigan Watcher posted:
Bring back Whitfield now there was a great ref.

NOT
:lol: 95% of people on here don't have a clue what you're on about, WW!!

That’s my problem I just don’t think and when I do I think everyone is as old as me!

Re: ganson and laughton

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:21 pm
by turf
We never get anything from Ganson's compatriot either - David Campbell.

Re: ganson and laughton

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 6:50 pm
by robjoenz
mickw posted:
we never get anything from ganson once a scouser always a scouser no stains ref should ever ref us, every time he has us were playing 14 men, and sending morley off against the aussies after 10 seconds ! week and kneed come to mind.
A bloke at work told me he has a photo of Ganson crying on the back of the bus on they way home from Wembley after we'd beat them 27-0. Unfortunately he's a Saints fan and won't let me borrow it to copy!

Re: ganson and laughton

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:30 pm
by robjoenz
That's called paranoia!

Re: ganson and laughton

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:33 pm
by willie c
robjoenz posted:
That's called paranoia!
isnt that a gum disease or something :lol:

Re: ganson and laughton

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:40 pm
by robjoenz
Flash posted:
robjoenz posted:
That's called paranoia!
5 words, Rob. Ganson crying on a bus....

:wink:
So.

Re: ganson and laughton

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:48 pm
by robjoenz
You can support a club and still remain impartial.

Re: ganson and laughton

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:53 pm
by robjoenz
Flash posted:
No you can't. I have never known a person who is truly impartial. We are all the sum total of our genes, upbringing and personal beliefs.
Well you, John, Andy and everyone else near us have a go at me enough for defending refereeing decisions when they go against Wigan! haha

Re: ganson and laughton

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:01 pm
by robjoenz
Flash posted:
Actually right there is a good example of what I mean. You believe you are being impartial, but you are actually being swayed by your affinity with the referees. I know of many people who believe they are impartial. Unfortunately it is a human impossibility.
I thought you might say that... however, I am a Wigan fan first and foremost, so surely that over rides any affinity with refereeing?

Re: ganson and laughton

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:29 pm
by robjoenz
Flash posted:
Not neccessarily. It all depends, as I said earlier, on your personal belief system. To tkae the current example that we have been discussing. Had the positions at Warrington been reversed and it had been Wigan players surrounding the ref etc. but instead of changing his decision he had penalised Wigan for dissent, I can well imagine you supporting/justifying that decision in exactly the same way as you did the one on Sunday.
Well I suppose I am trying to jump into the referees mind to try and think what he must have been thinking. Based on this I made the assumption that because he didn't penalise for dissent that the calls from the Warrington players were polite, if a little excitable.

If it had been the other way around and the penalty had gone against Wigan I would have assumed that something was said abusively.