Re: Tonights Game
Re: Tonights Game
sw PIG HEADED WAY OF SHOWING HIM WHO IS THE BOSS
Just a thought for the coach, why not pull Farrel into the middle after 20 minutes and run a fresh Larne Patrick at the centre with pace and power. And does he realise that a simple run around creates an overlap.
Just a thought for the coach, why not pull Farrel into the middle after 20 minutes and run a fresh Larne Patrick at the centre with pace and power. And does he realise that a simple run around creates an overlap.
- Firestarter
- Posts: 6237
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Tonights Game
if wane is so obsessed with a backup half or hooker,simply play lockers on the bench.Bench selection has been one of our Achilles heels over the last couple of years.we always seem to end up with more players out of position at the end of every game.This is why I thought jack Hughes was more valuable than large Patrick.Surely it pays off to have bench players than can cover more positions.captinjack wrote:Mistake letting Logan go to Salford. In my opinion a far better sub hooker than Powell.cpwigan wrote:Sam P tells Wane he is a great coach, that bot is going nowhere as long as Wane is coach.
I remember going to Widnes a few years ago.We were 18 nil up after 20 mins and lost the game.we had 4 big forwards on the bench and got hammered out wide when 2 threequarters got injured.Its ok having a big bench but skill will always overcome this
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Re: Tonights Game
Firestarter wrote:Good point about Hughes. Mind you if we had him available he'd be playing centre meaning Joel T would be back in the pack where he belongs.if wane is so obsessed with a backup half or hooker,simply play lockers on the bench.Bench selection has been one of our Achilles heels over the last couple of years.we always seem to end up with more players out of position at the end of every game.This is why I thought jack Hughes was more valuable than large Patrick.Surely it pays off to have bench players than can cover more positions.captinjack wrote: Mistake letting Logan go to Salford. In my opinion a far better sub hooker than Powell.
With only two fit centres going into the season we let the best cover go on loan.
-
- Posts: 5416
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:38 pm
Re: Tonights Game
I agree with DaveO and yourself about thisFirestarter wrote:if wane is so obsessed with a backup half or hooker,simply play lockers on the bench.Bench selection has been one of our Achilles heels over the last couple of years.we always seem to end up with more players out of position at the end of every game.This is why I thought jack Hughes was more valuable than large Patrick.Surely it pays off to have bench players than can cover more positions.captinjack wrote:Mistake letting Logan go to Salford. In my opinion a far better sub hooker than Powell.cpwigan wrote:Sam P tells Wane he is a great coach, that bot is going nowhere as long as Wane is coach.
I remember going to Widnes a few years ago.We were 18 nil up after 20 mins and lost the game.we had 4 big forwards on the bench and got hammered out wide when 2 threequarters got injured.Its ok having a big bench but skill will always overcome this
Seriously hope the number of interchanges do drop so more thought is needed regards substitutes and when players are brought on and off. Little, if any thought is used at the moment. We all know it goes "by the clock" regardless of what is happening on the pitch
[img]http://www.webdeveloper.com/animations/ ... monkey.gif[/img]
The biggest Room is the Room for improvement.
The best form of defence is attack!!
Out of the black and into the red, remember you don't get anything for two in a bed!!
The biggest Room is the Room for improvement.
The best form of defence is attack!!
Out of the black and into the red, remember you don't get anything for two in a bed!!
Re: Tonights Game
Ive been saying it since he came back from injury,quite how he keeps his place on his performances over the last few games is beyond meFirestarter wrote:At last,a Wigan fan that realises lockers isn't what he his made out to be :eusa2: :eusa2: :eusa2:superleague wrote:Mr lockers didn't look like he could organise a piss up in brewery, he offered no leadership to his playersddtftf wrote:The words HEADLESS CHICKENS IS APROPRIATE
-
- Posts: 38427
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Re: Tonights Game
Agree re Budgie at FBddtftf wrote:Simple Burges to fullback and Manfriedy on the wing, Burges is superb under a high ball and has an eye for an opening from the fullback position.JOB FIXED, CAN I BE THE COACH.
IF sw HAD KEPT DRIVING THE FORWARDS THROUGH THE MIDDLE THE SPACES WOULD HAVE DEVELOPED OUT WIDE.
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
-
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:54 am
Re: Tonights Game
The criticism of Sam Powell is laughable, people should watch the game again. McIllorum was awful and his passing game was the worst it has ever been.
Being a high earner, Bowen would be expected to perform in big games and quite frankly his 2 years at Wigan have been shithouse.
Matty Smith was poor again and his spot should be under scrutiny.
Being a high earner, Bowen would be expected to perform in big games and quite frankly his 2 years at Wigan have been shithouse.
Matty Smith was poor again and his spot should be under scrutiny.
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 9:23 pm
Re: Tonights Game
Ouote from Wane "There are other areas I'm just as upset about," said Wigan coach Shaun Wane. "It was a poor team performance and it's a tough one to deal with.ddtftf wrote:Simple Burges to fullback and Manfriedy on the wing, Burges is superb under a high ball and has an eye for an opening from the fullback position.JOB FIXED, CAN I BE THE COACH.
IF sw HAD KEPT DRIVING THE FORWARDS THROUGH THE MIDDLE THE SPACES WOULD HAVE DEVELOPED OUT WIDE.
"We just didn't play in the right areas of the field.
"It was an awful performance, we just never got into an arm wrestle and came up with silly errors and penalties. I'm really disappointed that we didn't challenge them in any area today. Not in the right areas of the field ..arm wrestle? are the players listing to Wane? answers please.
If we don't ask questions we turn into sheep...and I don't trust the shepherds.
Re: Tonights Game
Absolute nonsense, poor form TBW.TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Firstly if either of you can find a post of me ever saying super SW when we win then please feel free to share it!! I actually praise the players more for wins than I ever have SW!!sc74 wrote:You beat me to it. Win, super SW. Lose, poor players.cpwigan wrote:Let's get this right
I TBW will praise Wane when Wigan win BUT
I TBW will never criticise Wane whether Wigan win or lose
:with: :with: :with:
There's me thinking the coach is the most important person in any club![]()
Too much inconsistency. Not good enough. They were knackered, and even Laurel & Hardy pointed it out. Was there for the taking, thrown away.
Advantage SH, again.
Secondly, I have always said that results are down to the players and coach working together, sometimes the coach lets the players down and vice versa!!
Next I have always said it's a results business so give SW till the end of the season if no GF bye bye Shaun!!
.....and finally sc74 my opinion has always been consisitent regarding SW unlike your posting pattern, we win you have no internet in Turkey, we lose you are on fibre optic broadband hmmmmmmm!!
When I'm at work in the Middle East and extremely busy, then I often do't have time to post. At present, not working and have time to kill.
Shall I do a TBW and start calling for Mods?
- TrueBlueWarrior
- Posts: 6171
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: Tonights Game
Calling for mods because I question your posting pattern? If posters get away with calling other posters stupid then I am sure they won't give a care in the world about that. As for your posting patterns and opinions only you know the truth so I am happy to leave it there!!sc74 wrote:Absolute nonsense, poor form TBW.TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Firstly if either of you can find a post of me ever saying super SW when we win then please feel free to share it!! I actually praise the players more for wins than I ever have SW!!sc74 wrote: You beat me to it. Win, super SW. Lose, poor players.
Too much inconsistency. Not good enough. They were knackered, and even Laurel & Hardy pointed it out. Was there for the taking, thrown away.
Advantage SH, again.
Secondly, I have always said that results are down to the players and coach working together, sometimes the coach lets the players down and vice versa!!
Next I have always said it's a results business so give SW till the end of the season if no GF bye bye Shaun!!
.....and finally sc74 my opinion has always been consisitent regarding SW unlike your posting pattern, we win you have no internet in Turkey, we lose you are on fibre optic broadband hmmmmmmm!!
When I'm at work in the Middle East and extremely busy, then I often do't have time to post. At present, not working and have time to kill.
Shall I do a TBW and start calling for Mods?
Finally, I tell you what Is poor form, saying another poster says 'when we win super SW and when we lose poor players' so I am still waiting for evidence to back up what you said??
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett