O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
User avatar
TrueBlueWarrior
Posts: 6171
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm

Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final

Post by TrueBlueWarrior »

It was Hill he dumped!!
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
User avatar
Josie's friend
Posts: 523
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2016 4:54 am

Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final

Post by Josie's friend »

thegimble wrote:
Josie's friend wrote:
cpwigan wrote:Any reason JF. Personally other than two brain farts I see a lot to like.
Most people on here do that's why I never try and argue the point, even if the Grand Final 2014 never happened i'd of still of wanted him gone.
I just don't like small props who are easily bullied, Dudson made errors but when it came to battling against other props he held his own. Just my opinion tbh
Define small prop please
Line up all our props, the small one at the end is Flower. Small prop defined, you won't change my opinion so further discussion is pointless as it's obvious what is meant by small prop.
moto748
Posts: 5434
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final

Post by moto748 »

cpwigan wrote:Wire are a contradiction; so much is right but so much is equally wrong too. If all goes well they will destroy you but make them gring a win and they become brittle, they forget what made them strong and make mistakes under pressure. Wire are the epitomy of why British RL has been chasing the tails of the NRL for 30+ years.

The GF was Wires to lose and they bottled it when they found a XVII in Wigan who had buckets of courage and determination.
I think this is spot on.

Massive congratulations to the team on a tough and well-deserved win.
thegimble
Posts: 5968
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final

Post by thegimble »

Josie's friend wrote:
thegimble wrote:
Josie's friend wrote: Most people on here do that's why I never try and argue the point, even if the Grand Final 2014 never happened i'd of still of wanted him gone.
I just don't like small props who are easily bullied, Dudson made errors but when it came to battling against other props he held his own. Just my opinion tbh
Define small prop please
Line up all our props, the small one at the end is Flower. Small prop defined, you won't change my opinion so further discussion is pointless as it's obvious what is meant by small prop.
You mean any discussion apart from what you want to hear is pointless.

I will do both of us a favour since anything anyone has to say on the matter is pointless I will stick you on ignore so we no longer need to discuss anything.


User avatar
TrueBlueWarrior
Posts: 6171
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm

Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final

Post by TrueBlueWarrior »

Smaller in height but certainly not in width and breadth! :wink:
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
thegimble
Posts: 5968
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final

Post by thegimble »

TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Smaller in height but certainly not in width and breadth! :wink:
Flower reminds him of me. I used to be a union prop 6ft 17.5 stones. He has short bulky legs but massive body frame. I got unlucky I should be 6 ft 5 would have been a model for Jacomo though.

Its funny in work need trousers plz ok 42 inch waist is and 33 legs and you turn round on 42 inch and 27 leg. People think I am joking.

Height is not the marker for your weight.
User avatar
TrueBlueWarrior
Posts: 6171
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm

Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final

Post by TrueBlueWarrior »

thegimble wrote:
TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Smaller in height but certainly not in width and breadth! :wink:
Flower reminds him of me. I used to be a union prop 6ft 17.5 stones. He has short bulky legs but massive body frame. I got unlucky I should be 6 ft 5 would have been a model for Jacomo though.

Its funny in work need trousers plz ok 42 inch waist is and 33 legs and you turn round on 42 inch and 27 leg. People think I am joking.

Height is not the marker for your weight.
Huge part of power comes from the legs, look at Chris Hill compared to Ashton Sims, both similar height but Hill is far more productive due to his legs.
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
thegimble
Posts: 5968
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final

Post by thegimble »

TrueBlueWarrior wrote:
thegimble wrote:
TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Smaller in height but certainly not in width and breadth! :wink:
Flower reminds him of me. I used to be a union prop 6ft 17.5 stones. He has short bulky legs but massive body frame. I got unlucky I should be 6 ft 5 would have been a model for Jacomo though.

Its funny in work need trousers plz ok 42 inch waist is and 33 legs and you turn round on 42 inch and 27 leg. People think I am joking.

Height is not the marker for your weight.
Huge part of power comes from the legs, look at Chris Hill compared to Ashton Sims, both similar height but Hill is far more productive due to his legs.
Yes there is a lot more to a prop than just crashing in 10-15 meter carries. Hill is an exceptional prop.

Feka the biggest example good attack but defence a liability.
Post Reply