Page 11 of 11
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:35 pm
by TrueBlueWarrior
It was Hill he dumped!!
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:01 am
by Josie's friend
thegimble wrote:Josie's friend wrote:cpwigan wrote:Any reason JF. Personally other than two brain farts I see a lot to like.
Most people on here do that's why I never try and argue the point, even if the Grand Final 2014 never happened i'd of still of wanted him gone.
I just don't like small props who are easily bullied, Dudson made errors but when it came to battling against other props he held his own. Just my opinion tbh
Define small prop please
Line up all our props, the small one at the end is Flower. Small prop defined, you won't change my opinion so further discussion is pointless as it's obvious what is meant by small prop.
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 8:47 am
by moto748
cpwigan wrote:Wire are a contradiction; so much is right but so much is equally wrong too. If all goes well they will destroy you but make them gring a win and they become brittle, they forget what made them strong and make mistakes under pressure. Wire are the epitomy of why British RL has been chasing the tails of the NRL for 30+ years.
The GF was Wires to lose and they bottled it when they found a XVII in Wigan who had buckets of courage and determination.
I think this is spot on.
Massive congratulations to the team on a tough and well-deserved win.
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 9:52 am
by thegimble
Josie's friend wrote:thegimble wrote:Josie's friend wrote:
Most people on here do that's why I never try and argue the point, even if the Grand Final 2014 never happened i'd of still of wanted him gone.
I just don't like small props who are easily bullied, Dudson made errors but when it came to battling against other props he held his own. Just my opinion tbh
Define small prop please
Line up all our props, the small one at the end is Flower. Small prop defined, you won't change my opinion so further discussion is pointless as it's obvious what is meant by small prop.
You mean any discussion apart from what you want to hear is pointless.
I will do both of us a favour since anything anyone has to say on the matter is pointless I will stick you on ignore so we no longer need to discuss anything.
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:14 am
by TrueBlueWarrior
Smaller in height but certainly not in width and breadth!
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:29 am
by thegimble
TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Smaller in height but certainly not in width and breadth!
Flower reminds him of me. I used to be a union prop 6ft 17.5 stones. He has short bulky legs but massive body frame. I got unlucky I should be 6 ft 5 would have been a model for Jacomo though.
Its funny in work need trousers plz ok 42 inch waist is and 33 legs and you turn round on 42 inch and 27 leg. People think I am joking.
Height is not the marker for your weight.
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:32 am
by TrueBlueWarrior
thegimble wrote:TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Smaller in height but certainly not in width and breadth!
Flower reminds him of me. I used to be a union prop 6ft 17.5 stones. He has short bulky legs but massive body frame. I got unlucky I should be 6 ft 5 would have been a model for Jacomo though.
Its funny in work need trousers plz ok 42 inch waist is and 33 legs and you turn round on 42 inch and 27 leg. People think I am joking.
Height is not the marker for your weight.
Huge part of power comes from the legs, look at Chris Hill compared to Ashton Sims, both similar height but Hill is far more productive due to his legs.
Re: O’Loughlin has ‘remote chance’ of playing in Grand Final
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:49 am
by thegimble
TrueBlueWarrior wrote:thegimble wrote:TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Smaller in height but certainly not in width and breadth!
Flower reminds him of me. I used to be a union prop 6ft 17.5 stones. He has short bulky legs but massive body frame. I got unlucky I should be 6 ft 5 would have been a model for Jacomo though.
Its funny in work need trousers plz ok 42 inch waist is and 33 legs and you turn round on 42 inch and 27 leg. People think I am joking.
Height is not the marker for your weight.
Huge part of power comes from the legs, look at Chris Hill compared to Ashton Sims, both similar height but Hill is far more productive due to his legs.
Yes there is a lot more to a prop than just crashing in 10-15 meter carries. Hill is an exceptional prop.
Feka the biggest example good attack but defence a liability.