Page 13 of 18
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:33 pm
by cpwigan
People always said but what about McDermott etc and 3 years seems so harsh but maybe Jack was right.
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:35 pm
by TrueBlueWarrior
medlocke wrote:TrueBlueWarrior wrote:cpwigan wrote:He will never walk so unless IL boots him we are stuck with him. People scoffed at my Jack Gibson, 3 years no more at a club but Wane has been here too long; maybe McDermott too at Leeds.
Looking at your 3 year rule, then McDermott would have left before he won the treble last season!!
The imaginery 3 year rule pops up again
As does waneball, arrogance, injuries etc.
I said we should freshen things up at the end of last season but saying the same things over and over is getting tedious!!
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:36 pm
by TrueBlueWarrior
cpwigan wrote:People always said but what about McDermott etc and 3 years seems so harsh but maybe Jack was right.
How? I hope you don't teach Maths cp!!
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:41 pm
by Wandering Warrior
medlocke wrote:TrueBlueWarrior wrote:cpwigan wrote:He will never walk so unless IL boots him we are stuck with him. People scoffed at my Jack Gibson, 3 years no more at a club but Wane has been here too long; maybe McDermott too at Leeds.
Looking at your 3 year rule, then McDermott would have left before he won the treble last season!!
The imaginery 3 year rule pops up again
Be careful, it's nearly bedtime and insomnia could be cured quite soon!
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:50 pm
by Kittwazzer
My fault and I take full responsibility. I should never have gone.
Sorry!
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:17 pm
by josie andrews
Kittwazzer wrote:My fault and I take full responsibility. I should never have gone.
Sorry!
Yeah your fault
You said you weren't goin & there I go & spot you behind the bike sheds having a crafty fag
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:35 pm
by cpwigan
cherry.pie wrote:cpwigan wrote:Sutton at loose forward was bizarre IMO. We had Burke and Tea Towel on the bench.
Don't think there was much of a choice. We didn't really have anyone to put there who could match the defensive work rate and mobility of O'Loughlin or Bateman. Burke was probably a better bet but Sutton has played loose forward before.
No matter who played there we were always going to lack defensive mobility, particularly in the middle of the park. Mossop is now a joke of a player. Sutton was caught out badly a few times. Burke is good but is still prone to be beaten by players with a good step. Clubb must be carrying a knock because he's nowhere near his energetic self. Bretherton is usually a strong defender but he hasn't played in months so was probably lacking match fitness. Tautai is good for 15 minutes but will also be easily exposed when he tires.
Is see Sutton as a prop Cherry. Personally, I would have combined Tautai and Burke at LF.
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:36 pm
by cpwigan
How were the Wakey fans?
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 11:51 pm
by medlocke
cpwigan wrote:People always said but what about McDermott etc and 3 years seems so harsh but maybe Jack was right.
How was Jack right? the only reason he didn't stay anywhere longer than 3 years was because he didn't like the board members interfering, it had nothing to do with the performance or success of the team
Re: v Wakefield
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:19 am
by Kittwazzer
cpwigan wrote:How were the Wakey fans?
They had their day at the beach. At around 20-0 they were chanting "Are you Rhinos in disguise?"!
At 40 it was "We're gonna win the League"!
Last 5 minutes they dubbed us 'Wigan Rhinos'!