Page 3 of 5

Re: Mathers

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:23 am
by cpwigan
A cheerleader doth not maketh a RL player

Why are people so desparate to praise certain players.

Analysis of his match - Negative (Pelo mugged him for try 1) Positive (Scored his 2nd try of the season. A set move. He only had to run. Phelps could have done the same from FB but with greater ease)

He never broke a tackle on a kick return. A huge weakness in his game. I thought he covered kick returns quite well. I do not think he could be blamed for not stopping the French forward who scored after Fielden missed him.

So Mathers missed a tackle, finished off a set move. Nothing else. Oh and he screamed like Meg Ryan in a movie (Sleepless in Seattle?)

Can we have praise where praise is due.

The grumpy old git :shau:

Re: Mathers

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:20 pm
by GeoffN
cpwigan wrote:A cheerleader doth not maketh a RL player

Why are people so desparate to praise certain players.

Analysis of his match - Negative (Pelo mugged him for try 1) Positive (Scored his 2nd try of the season. A set move. He only had to run. Phelps could have done the same from FB but with greater ease)

He never broke a tackle on a kick return. A huge weakness in his game. I thought he covered kick returns quite well. I do not think he could be blamed for not stopping the French forward who scored after Fielden missed him.

So Mathers missed a tackle, finished off a set move. Nothing else. Oh and he screamed like Meg Ryan in a movie (Sleepless in Seattle?)

Can we have praise where praise is due.

The grumpy old git :shau:
I think you're overdoing it, cp! Nobody is saying he's a wonder player; we're saying it's a massive improvement on a few months ago, and surely that's all we want from all of them. Earlier this season Greenshiels and McGuire would have waltzed past him when they made those early midfield breaks, last night he stopped them.

He didn't do anything spectacular, but neither did a lot of the players, the important thing is he only made one real mistake - as did most of the team.

Re: Mathers

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:30 pm
by cpwigan
God wrote:Were you are on the negative side of things im on the positive side although what you do say regards negative is spot on. I like to make positives out of it though hahaha.

I have said time and time again, i like players to ram my critism down my throat, and unlike some posters they still maintain they are correct even though they are clearly wrong to "save face".
My early season issue was Fielden, I gave him so much abuse about his peformances and compairing it to what he was getting paid and at the time it was justified no matter how positive you are, now hes ramming my comments down my throat and im glad.

Which brings me onto Mathers,this is the only thing regards the players i 100% dont agree with you, tonight i thought he played very well his form is returning and his enthusiasm was there to see. Saved 3 trys and scored.
He was wrong footed for Pelos try but made up for it by scoring one ironicly beating Pelo to the line.
His positioning is spot on even the commentators mentioned it, he out played Greenshields who has more tackles bust than any other player this year.
So my question is WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT FROM HIM? because i am at a loss.

He wants to play for Wigan and if he returns to NRL and Leeds form we have a bargin no dubt. Get behind him, give him encouragement and he will be the next England number 1 when the slug retires.
A full back must kick return to a level where he breaks the first line or at worst achieves a favourable and fast play of the ball to let the set get on a roll. The first hit up in any set often determines the whole set. Mathers gets hammered or has to become a worm.

A full back must score tries. In modern RL the fullback often outscores the wingers.

On those basis Mathers fails.

If people watch the team and say in 2009 or beyond if we are to become a great team what needs to happen. FB would be one area where we need far more.

Re: Mathers

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:55 pm
by GeoffN
cpwigan wrote: A full back must kick return to a level where he breaks the first line or at worst achieves a favourable and fast play of the ball to let the set get on a roll. The first hit up in any set often determines the whole set. Mathers gets hammered or has to become a worm.

A full back must score tries. In modern RL the fullback often outscores the wingers.

On those basis Mathers fails.

If people watch the team and say in 2009 or beyond if we are to become a great team what needs to happen. FB would be one area where we need far more.
I agree, but he's not the liability he used to be. Of course there are better ones around, (including Richards, and maybe even Phelps), but he's getting better.

In any case. Lockers will be our first choice fullback next year... :roll:

Re: Mathers

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:47 pm
by jackoh
The bottom line is , he can`t tackle ,
This is what he`s there for , He`s got pace with the ball in hand and yesterday he showed it .
I can`t understand why we`ve retained him as he`s not a top class full back .


Re: Mathers

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:59 pm
by josie andrews
jackoh wrote:The bottom line is , he can`t tackle ,
This is what he`s there for , He`s got pace with the ball in hand and yesterday he showed it .
I can`t understand why we`ve retained him as he`s not a top class full back .


:eusa9: no negative posts please :)

Re: Mathers

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:10 pm
by ferreira
for the love of god people give him a break.. bad injury takes time 1st proper season back. not finished too many trys so been down on confidence but he sure as hell makes up for it in determination! look at the lad last night he was so passionate after that try! after all pat richards had such a sluggish start at wigan!! he got an injury before coming over here. hes good but richards ain't at his best like he was at the tigers if any one watched him back then!! best hand of in all the game!! mathers and richards are all ways improving. just takes them time, i am sure price will be like it next season but he will be a top class winger or a center after alot of game time. i don't understand why people criticize so much about the team the so called love. noble feka mathers fielden even bloody barrett had hes moaners this season! some of you make comparisons to old players but a lot of them you make comparisons too wouldn't be as effective in this modern day i don't care what you say plus players who have that ability in this day just demand whey too much salary to have players like that from 1-13.

Re: Mathers

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:54 pm
by cpwigan
Jackoh I love you :) You can be in my gang

Fulbacks should be amongst the highest paid players in every team. The position is now far more important than it ever was. Hooker, Halfback and Fullback are the 3 key positions.

As for fullbacks. There's an aboriginee called Walker at the Titans. He's young. I bet they would loan him for a season. He is amongst if not the fastest player (s) in the NRL. His main forte is attack. He would go better in SL than the NRL.

Re: Mathers

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:40 pm
by butt monkey
cpwigan wrote:Fulbacks should be amongst the highest paid players in every team. The position is now far more important than it ever was. Hooker, Halfback and Fullback are the 3 key positions.

As for fullbacks. There's an aboriginee called Walker at the Titans. He's young. I bet they would loan him for a season. He is amongst if not the fastest player (s) in the NRL. His main forte is attack. He would go better in SL than the NRL.
This guy?
"Shannon has been playing poorly and does not deserve selection," a forthright Cartwright said. "There are a few options, including Ben Jeffery. Mat Rogers will stay at five-eighth because he and Scott Prince have worked well together there."

Walker, The Courier-Mail's 2007 Queensland Cup player of the year, has played only three NRL games this year, and in recent weeks has struggled in the Toyota Cup under-20 side, particularly under the high ball.

There are suggestions the 19-year-old has not come to terms with the demands of being a professional footballer but club officials remain confident he will prove a good investment. "We will be patient with Shannon," Titans managing director Michael Searle said.

"We have signed him until 2012 and no one here doubts his ability. We'll have a chat to him at the end of the season about the way things have gone this year but it's just one of those things. Some players come through quicker than others."
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/ ... 55,00.html

Re: Mathers

Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:42 pm
by pedro
I agree with Jackoh (as hes my father) :D

He cannot tackle. You missed one miss tackle as Matchers just totally misses him and hes a glare on the screen.

He is better than he was at the start of the season bit that doesnt mean he is good. An improvement on poor doesnt mean he its good.

If he continues to improve though think how good he will be mid next season.

To be fair he does have a great amount of enthusiasm which the team needed and it may be rubbing off. His try was took very well and his attacking play is imporving every week.

I just wish he could tackle, a knee injury will not stop you tackling so I cannot see it as an excuse. It may make you rusty but you never forget how to tackle.

May need more work...fingers crossed