WiganWarriorsFans.com

I do think the Roby injury played a part as they cannot afford to be without either.

Like my dad said earlier Hock got 5 games was it for pulling the refs are to get his attention (other clubs do this every week also but nothing) and a punch is unpunished maybe we should have a huge brawl this weekend and they would be hard pushed to ban anyone.

pedro wrote:I do think the Roby injury played a part as they cannot afford to be without either.

Like my dad said earlier Hock got 5 games was it for pulling the refs are to get his attention (other clubs do this every week also but nothing) and a punch is unpunished maybe we should have a huge brawl this weekend and they would be hard pushed to ban anyone.

No they don't. I've not seen a player touch the ref intentionally since Hock. Hock was not vicitimised. You don't grab the ref.

Great letter Matthew! I'll be sending something similar.

Mike wrote:

pedro wrote:I do think the Roby injury played a part as they cannot afford to be without either.

Like my dad said earlier Hock got 5 games was it for pulling the refs are to get his attention (other clubs do this every week also but nothing) and a punch is unpunished maybe we should have a huge brawl this weekend and they would be hard pushed to ban anyone.

No they don't. I've not seen a player touch the ref intentionally since Hock. Hock was not vicitimised. You don't grab the ref.

agreed

Mike wrote:

pedro wrote:I do think the Roby injury played a part as they cannot afford to be without either.

Like my dad said earlier Hock got 5 games was it for pulling the refs are to get his attention (other clubs do this every week also but nothing) and a punch is unpunished maybe we should have a huge brawl this weekend and they would be hard pushed to ban anyone.

No they don't. I've not seen a player touch the ref intentionally since Hock. Hock was not vicitimised. You don't grab the ref.

Ive seen plenty Leeds do it touch them on the shoulder to talk to them and so on still classed as touching the ref.

pedro wrote:

Mike wrote:

pedro wrote:I do think the Roby injury played a part as they cannot afford to be without either.

Like my dad said earlier Hock got 5 games was it for pulling the refs are to get his attention (other clubs do this every week also but nothing) and a punch is unpunished maybe we should have a huge brawl this weekend and they would be hard pushed to ban anyone.

No they don't. I've not seen a player touch the ref intentionally since Hock. Hock was not vicitimised. You don't grab the ref.

Ive seen plenty Leeds do it touch them on the shoulder to talk to them and so on still classed as touching the ref.

and briers does it.

Not according to some, lots of players do it. Ive heard the ref warn them before "dont touch me" AFTER the Hock incident.

Anyway he should be banned

i think the coaches and the clubs should be asking the rfl for the reason behind this stupid and BIASED decision.i don't know what the stains have on the rfl but i am sick of them getting away with warnings only over the salary cap(minor descretions)year after year,players with no case to answer pryce/and a.n.o against warrington on grix,and now this joke of a decision with k.f.c,if a player wearing cherry and white had thrown that punch he wouldn't have got away with a warning.level playing field my backside it is as long as it's in the stains favour.

also Cunningham failed a drug test

highland convert wrote:enquiries@rfl.uk.com
Usually find it does more good to send it through the enquiries desk. Sent to an indevidual all he/she ends up doing is press delete. Every enquiry has to be checked and forwarded,
Jim

thank you Jim

one e mail winging its way