Page 4 of 4
Re: Mark Flanagan
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:15 pm
by ian.birchall
cpwigan wrote:LooseHead wrote:51 tackles against saints by Flanagan according to League Express ; phenomenal effort :eusa2:
Can a player making 50 tackles be dropped?
Yes says Noble.
The truth although it hurts is that we do not need any more back row forwards and unless we move Lulu to Hooker, Sam to scrum half we cannot afford to keep Flanagan on the salary cap rota
Re: Mark Flanagan
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:06 pm
by cpwigan
Flannagan as reserve hooker to Riddell leave Tommy at 7 no chaos required.
Re: Mark Flanagan
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:56 pm
by medlocke
LooseHead wrote:51 tackles against saints by Flanagan according to League Express ; phenomenal effort :eusa2:
WOW hes even better than Lockers
Re: Mark Flanagan
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:40 am
by Spanakopitta
hmmm me thinks Mr Leneghan should be eating his words.
Spoke to him in Last Drop Pub after Murrayfield game, my boyfriend is a fax fan and asked Leneghan when they could have Flanaghan back - boyfriend really rates him and couldn;t understand why he wasn't being given a chance.
IL said he's NOT BIG enough, he's not a second row, better at stand off - well after what i've seen of his defence, he certainly cuts it for me.
IL also said at time that they'd looked at letting him go.
Re: Mark Flanagan
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:03 pm
by GeoffN
cpwigan wrote:Flannagan as reserve hooker to Riddell leave Tommy at 7 no chaos required.
Agreed, until MM is back.
Re: Mark Flanagan
Posted: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:48 am
by warrior till i die
in my opinion flanagan should be the reserve hooker this week against wire. and continue to use 3 props- personally joel tomkins wouldnt get in my team this week, hes given away too many silly penalties and made too many errors over the last few weeks.
phelps,roberts,gleeson,carmont,richards,sam,tommy,coley,riddell,prescott,hansen,bailey,o'loughlin flanagan,feka,fielden,mossop
this is the way forward for saturday