you will find its what the other fella said.thegimble wrote:If Team honors determine a players greatness then Andy Farrell during the Super League era was average.pedro wrote:no more than what honours the TEAM wins in a season
Danny Brough
Re: Danny Brough
-
TrueBlueWarrior
- Posts: 6171
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 10:17 pm
Re: Danny Brough
Pedro you need to read the thread through properly, you seem very confused if you think I said that!!pedro wrote:you will find its what the other fella said.thegimble wrote:If Team honors determine a players greatness then Andy Farrell during the Super League era was average.pedro wrote:no more than what honours the TEAM wins in a season
'If you start listening to the fans it won't be long before you're sitting with them.' - Wayne Bennett
Re: Danny Brough
Brough i would take he is a very good player in an average side. Whilst Andy Farrell was an exceptional player at times playing in an average side. Hence why we did not win 2 or 3 more Grand Finals during his time with us in the Super League era. And why we lost 3 grand finals.TrueBlueWarrior wrote:Pedro you need to read the thread through properly, you seem very confused if you think I said that!!pedro wrote:you will find its what the other fella said.thegimble wrote: If Team honors determine a players greatness then Andy Farrell during the Super League era was average.
Put Brough in our side and Green in the Giants and it would have been the same result Giants get LLS and we get both trophies. And we could have had the thread the other way round.
Some do not see qualities in some opposition especially when its a player leaving us. We tend to put them on a pedestal for eg. Goulding.
-
Owd Codger
- Posts: 5628
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:20 am
Re: Danny Brough
When he is good, he is very good, but when he is bad, he is horrid!
Now, where did that come from?
Now, where did that come from?