WiganWarriorsFans.com

thegimble wrote:

pedro wrote:no more than what honours the TEAM wins in a season

If Team honors determine a players greatness then Andy Farrell during the Super League era was average.

you will find its what the other fella said.

pedro wrote:

thegimble wrote:

pedro wrote:no more than what honours the TEAM wins in a season

If Team honors determine a players greatness then Andy Farrell during the Super League era was average.

you will find its what the other fella said.

Pedro you need to read the thread through properly, you seem very confused if you think I said that!!

TrueBlueWarrior wrote:

pedro wrote:

thegimble wrote: If Team honors determine a players greatness then Andy Farrell during the Super League era was average.

you will find its what the other fella said.

Pedro you need to read the thread through properly, you seem very confused if you think I said that!!

Brough i would take he is a very good player in an average side. Whilst Andy Farrell was an exceptional player at times playing in an average side. Hence why we did not win 2 or 3 more Grand Finals during his time with us in the Super League era. And why we lost 3 grand finals.

Put Brough in our side and Green in the Giants and it would have been the same result Giants get LLS and we get both trophies. And we could have had the thread the other way round.

Some do not see qualities in some opposition especially when its a player leaving us. We tend to put them on a pedestal for eg. Goulding.

When he is good, he is very good, but when he is bad, he is horrid!

Now, where did that come from?