Re: Warrington, it just gets silly.

gpartin · Post by **gpartin** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:52 pm

Kittwazzer wrote:Maybe the real truth will eventually emerge in someone's autobiography now that Longy has started the ball rolling!!

I'm sure it will but the fact that players are guilty of tax evasion if they don't declare it probably means it may not be for a good few years.

Kittwazzer · Post by **Kittwazzer** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:40 pm

gpartin wrote:
Kittwazzer wrote:Maybe the real truth will eventually emerge in someone's autobiography now that Longy has started the ball rolling!!
I'm sure it will but the fact that players are guilty of tax evasion if they don't declare it probably means it may not be for a good few years.

Maybe when his Sky contract runs out, Mr Cullen might put pen to paper. I bet he knows where the bodies are buried!! :eusa2: :eusa2:

ian.birchall · Post by **ian.birchall** » Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:09 pm

ddtftf wrote:Red hall is a joke with a rule for one and rules for others.

Catalans no salary capp/ as many Aus players as they like, or are they now French after staying in a hotel for a week.

I am pretty sure that they have less than Wigans' EIGHT

warrior1973 · Post by **warrior1973** » Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:23 pm

Lets go back to bascs with this salery cap. It was broght in so that clubs couldnt buy all the best players and pay them the highest salery then win all the trophies. It was also brought in so that smaller clubs within Superleague didnt fold and that all teams no matter what attendances they had would stay affloat. Dont forget its called the "sky sports Superleague" and that the comp is funded by sky!!!. The money paid from sky pays for wages paid to the players within the salery cap. That means big teams with big attendences should be racking up the profits cause none of their revenue coming in is spent on the players!!!. However we all know this isnt true, Wigan St Helens Leeds and Bradford all run at a loss every fiancial year!!!. Before sky came in lets not forget that all players wages were paid from the clubs revenues, all this money should now be in the bank earning the clubs a huge profit!!!. No matter which way it is done, the bigger teams will alwyas find ways to pay the players out of the clubs profits.

jaws1 · Post by **jaws1** » Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:47 pm

warrior1973 wrote:Lets go back to bascs with this salery cap. It was broght in so that clubs couldnt buy all the best players and pay them the highest salery then win all the trophies. It was also brought in so that smaller clubs within Superleague didnt fold and that all teams no matter what attendances they had would stay affloat. Dont forget its called the "sky sports Superleague" and that the comp is funded by sky!!!. The money paid from sky pays for wages paid to the players within the salery cap. That means big teams with big attendences should be racking up the profits cause none of their revenue coming in is spent on the players!!!. However we all know this isnt true, Wigan St Helens Leeds and Bradford all run at a loss every fiancial year!!!. Before sky came in lets not forget that all players wages were paid from the clubs revenues, all this money should now be in the bank earning the clubs a huge profit!!!. No matter which way it is done, the bigger teams will alwyas find ways to pay the players out of the clubs profits.

Don't know where you get that Sky is paying the wages of the players.I was led to beleive that SKY pay the money and then SL allocate Â£750.000 to each team the shortfall of the Â£1.7 million paid to the players through the turnstiles ,sponsorship,kit money etc. Not taking into account the Coaches wages ,backroom staff etc,running costs National Insurance contributions etc.Thats why Wigan made a loss for the last 5 years and no profit ?????