Well I would say to attribute the next ten years success to the time Murphy was at the club is equally daft. As you said Murphy took us to a level higher than Bamford but probably wasn't going to take the club any higher.Doug Stand posted:
To not recognise Murphy as the instigator or at least a huge contributor to Wigan's sucess is just nieve and daft.
There was therefore no guarentee that the good work Murphy did wold be continued. It wasn't a finished job and Mo was the steward in charge of taking the club up another level. This he did by appointing the likes of Loewe and Monie.
And hasn't he done just that? That is one reasn why I don't get the constant slagging off of Mo. In the past the success of the club with him in charge speaks for itself. You can argue the toss as to why it was successful but if people want to blame Mo when things are not going so well because he is in charge then as he was in charge during the good times he ought to get the credit.Mojo for me has done great work, but now he is beleiving his own propoganda that he should make playing staff decisions. He did well, with Bots and how much his influence was in bringing in Miles, Hanley, Kenny...well I just don't know. The fact that Wigan were an up and coming side. Guaranteed sucess and a bumper wage packet would help.
So yes, he's done great work, but he should as he is leave the playing staff decisions to his coach.
He has now stepped aside from the signing of players and let Millward make his oen team.
It seems to me in the past he made good decsions and now, by letting Millward have his way, he has made another good decision.
I don't think anyone thinks he's great in that sense but I think it is unfair to only concentrate on the negatives to the extent of even suggesting some of the good he clearly did was done by someome else.He's not as worthless as some make out, but he's not even close to being as great as other make out.
Dave