Page 6 of 6
Re: Lockers
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:38 pm
by OAMJSONA
CP i take it you are one of the Lockers fans then .
well i am not M8 , his non tackles led to two tries which ever way you want to call it
Re: Lockers
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:55 pm
by cpwigan
I am. I have a lot of belief in the following players; Barrett, Leulia, Fielden, Higham, Feka, Hock and Lockers from the starting 13
From the youngsters; O'Carrol, Goulding, JTomkins, McLlorum, Kavanagh, Mossop, Stanton, TCoyle, Ainscough, LFarrell, STomkins.
Re: Lockers
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:12 pm
by gillysmyhero
OAM posted:
CP i take it you are one of the Lockers fans then .
well i am not M8 , his non tackles led to two tries which ever way you want to call it
I think you're blinkered because you dont rate lockers,if you watch the dvd of League of Their own 2, it shows how much time & effort Nobby puts into tackling technnique's even down to how to & were to hold a player both to stop the offload & also stop the player when he's on the on the ground making a quick play the ball.So if Nobby didn't want Lockers to tackle the way he does im sure he would have made him change his technique by now.
Re: Lockers
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:45 am
by cpwigan
1 marker at the POTB is suicidal the way the game is plaed these days. Chris Anderson recently eperimented with it at the Roosters and it failed very badly.
Re: Lockers
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:54 am
by butt monkey
So it's not illegal then!!. My point is that Chris Anderson's side might have had harder working markers, and as such missed the extra man. Whereas Wigan wouldn't see much use from five markers let alone the two spectating there. One of them, might be better used in the defensive line.
Re: Lockers
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:31 am
by cpwigan
1 marker fails because the way the rules are it enabled opposition teams to make easy yards around the POTB from tackle 1. Progressively it got even worse a you went through the set as the attack gained momentum tackle after tackle.
Re: Lockers
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:45 am
by playfuldodger1
there is no way he should be captain, Andy Farrell he is not, the way he shys away from any responsibility is a joke, he never fires up the players, never backs any1 up. As for who should be captain i can think of a few, Barrett, i agree he as not been here long but he is very influential and when under the sticks at least he will talk rather than shy away with his head down, a captain for the future maybe, fletcher, shows more desire when under pressure than any1, some awesome drives from is line this season, cant really think of any more players who would be deserving or that would be good enough so i would have to go for barrett captain and then fletcher, any1 agree or wot, first things fiirst though lets drop sean for a few games so if he can buck is ideas up, or at least get some fire in is belly
playfuldodger
Re: Lockers
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:16 pm
by bertina
playfuldodger1 posted:
there is no way he should be captain, Andy Farrell he is not, the way he shys away from any responsibility is a joke, he never fires up the players, never backs any1 up. As for who should be captain i can think of a few, Barrett, i agree he as not been here long but he is very influential and when under the sticks at least he will talk rather than shy away with his head down, a captain for the future maybe, fletcher, shows more desire when under pressure than any1, some awesome drives from is line this season, cant really think of any more players who would be deserving or that would be good enough so i would have to go for barrett captain and then fletcher, any1 agree or wot, first things fiirst though lets drop sean for a few games so if he can buck is ideas up, or at least get some fire in is belly
playfuldodger
You must be out of your mind suggesting that lockers should be dropped. ENOUGH SAID!!