Morph wrote:DaveO wrote:Morph wrote:
It was always going to take time to re build properly top to bottom especially after Millward went - I'd be quite happy for Noble to be here for at least 2 more years, as I think it will take this minimum for us to lift a trophy again, and if that occurs, we should be looking to extend his contract further.
And what will you say if at the end of 2009 we have once again not made any improvement? That would be three years of no progress. The option on his contract is due then so the club has a decision to make.
What would yours be?
And on another note, given not only have we not improved this year but have actually gone backwards in the league and cup, does Noble have no responsibility for this at all?
Dave
Please read the bit in bold Dave, i think that answers your question.
Let's look at it again though-
1st year or half year - Avoided relegation- Pretty successful in my opinion, perhaps you take issue with that. I don't know.
The issue I have is we have not since then played to the standard we did in avoiding the drop after Noble arrived for the latter half of 2006 season. We have gone backwards in both seasons.
This year we have performed even worse in the league and cup already and we are clinging to the hope of a miracle in the play off's to have something to show for this season.
2nd year - Semi -final of cup, and one game from the playoffs - A marked improvement on the year before? :eh:
Have you forgotten what it was like actually watching the side in 2007? It was pretty much like this - not much of a pleasure.
We were as inconsistent in 2007 as we have been in 2008 but this was masked by two semi final appearances both of which showed the club up as not good enough. As predro said the CC semi was an embarrassment. It was not an achievement.
3rd year - Have made the playoffs, who knows how we'll finish it- not me and certainly not you.
Again have you not watched the games? The fact we have made the playoffs (ignoring the early cup exit I see) winning fewer games than last season is not something I see as an improvement.
I don't think anyone is daft enough to think that raw statistic tells the story of our season or proves we are a good side making progress. Watching the games should have told you the opposite.
In answer to the improvement or lack of it come 2009, then it all depends on your view on what makes a successful season. If you are of the mindset that anything other than a league and cup double will suffice, then your living in cloud cuckoo land. if your happy to be more realistic then I would suggest that for next year, a good year would be looking to make the top 4, top 3 overacheiving, and a good run in the cup.
I am certainly not living in cloud cukoo land but what you say above is IMO the kind of improvement we should have got
THIS season. I have yet to say any plausible defence from you or anyone else for us having gone backwards apart from we might do well in the play off's.
We may even make the grand final, but I don't see us winning a trophy next year, however i would expect us to have closed the gap on Saints, perhaps not beating them on every occasion but at hopefully once and being competitive, a sad situation, but one where we are at the moment. Hopefully I've answered your questions.
Well if you mean yes you would still give Noble another two years if we have another season like this in 2009, I suppose you have answered that one.
I can't say I see an answer to the simple question of does Noble have no responsibility for our lack of improvement this year.
I notice its a typical Dave O snipe though, ignoring most of my previous post and concentrating on a portion of it. So then Dave as I've been good enough to answer your question designed to patronise, as all your posts seem to be, perhaps you could answer the one I posed my previous post. If you want rid of Noble who would you appoint, who is available, and while you at it how about giving us all and insight into your thoughts on where you see Wigan RLFC at the end of the next season?
Morph...
Don't be so ridiculous. I asked a perfectly straightforward couple of questions as I simply can't see why IF we have another season like this anyone would want to persist with Noble as coach after 2009. We will be the next Warrington if we do IMO.
I am also realistic enough to know we won't sack Noble but that the end of 2009 is definitely a decision time for the club as that is when the option on his contract is up for renewal.
As to who we get to replace him that will depend who is around at the time but I think you need to realise coaches get sacked for failing to do the job, not because there is a ready made replacement available standing outside the entrance.
It is quite plausible for a coach to be sacked (or his contract not renewed) without a club having lined up the replacement. So even if there is no obvious choice making it known they are after a new job, it should not preclude us getting rid of Noble because
there is absolutely no way you should extend the contract of a coach that has failed. None at all. That will be the choice the club faces at the end of 2009 if we have another poor season. Renew the contract of a coach who has taken us know where in 3 years or look somewhere else.
Will we actually have another dross season? Well I don't see any great improvement to the squad and we have the same coach so I can't say I am optimistic.
Dave