Page 7 of 11

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:43 pm
by BriH
'Brian Edgar' - are you from Workington by any chance?

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:55 pm
by Brian Edgar
Yes

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:45 pm
by Kiwiseddon
Fujiman wrote:
Matthew wrote:
DaveO wrote: CPW you have been banned already.

Dave
When/what did CP get banned for? I go away for a couple of days and miss everything - typical!
I've missed that one as well! :o
Me too. Would someone please enlighten us

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 2:51 pm
by gpartin
Kiwiseddon wrote:
Fujiman wrote:
Matthew wrote: When/what did CP get banned for? I go away for a couple of days and miss everything - typical!
I've missed that one as well! :o
Me too. Would someone please enlighten us
Salem witch trials.

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:13 pm
by josie andrews
gpartin wrote:
Kiwiseddon wrote:
Fujiman wrote:I've missed that one as well! :o
Me too. Would someone please enlighten us
Salem witch trials.
I didn't know either, a fellow mod enlightened me last weekthat it happened when I was away for the Catalan game

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:18 pm
by josie andrews
gpartin wrote:Salem witch trials.
??

From what I was told it was an agreement reached between available mods & Mike.

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:30 pm
by Fujiman
josie andrews wrote:
gpartin wrote:Salem witch trials.
??

From what I was told it was an agreement reached between available mods & Mike.
What was the reason though. I didn't agree with a lot that he wrote but still looked forward to reading it. There were times he went OTT but thought he'd calmed down a bit lately. think the mods should issue a statement to clarify

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:41 pm
by josie andrews
Fujiman wrote:
josie andrews wrote:
gpartin wrote:Salem witch trials.
??

From what I was told it was an agreement reached between available mods & Mike.
What was the reason though. I didn't agree with a lot that he wrote but still looked forward to reading it. There were times he went OTT but thought he'd calmed down a bit lately. think the mods should issue a statement to clarify
I don't know the actual details as I wasn't involved. I believe it is the prerogative of the owner of the site, Mike, as to who is allowed to be a member of the forum.

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:42 pm
by gpartin
certain people got what they wanted. First I heard about it was Medlocke crowing about it on RLfans. The problem is there's too many 'offline' stuff going on on facebook etc and if you back people into a corner for long enough they will snap. Certain people who are meant to be stopping intimidation and victimisation on here are blind to it because they disagree with CP's point of view.

Re: Wigan 16 Warrington 23

Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:51 pm
by gpartin
now no doubt I'll be criticised/warned/banned or whatever for openly giving my opinion but on a site with a membership far smaller than other forums opposing views are necessary to keep debate going and what ever anyone thinks of CP he does that.