WiganWarriorsFans.com

Flash wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 6:10 pm

archiekeith wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:56 am No it's not flash. I'm referring to your "moot" conclusion. The topic under discussion concerns " penalties " The Referee's decision was provoked by the infringement of the rules of the game. Silmple! Anyway I've spouted enough and to be honest with you the only static ( the final score is the only one that interests me.We have a good team and coaches so I'm going to finish my not very moot (I hope ) assertion Cheers!

I'm afraid it is moot, mate, as you've introduced a straw man argument. I never claimed that penalties weren't provoked.

archiekeith wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 4:58 pm

Flash wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 6:10 pm

archiekeith wrote: ↑Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:56 am No it's not flash. I'm referring to your "moot" conclusion. The topic under discussion concerns " penalties " The Referee's decision was provoked by the infringement of the rules of the game. Silmple! Anyway I've spouted enough and to be honest with you the only static ( the final score is the only one that interests me.We have a good team and coaches so I'm going to finish my not very moot (I hope ) assertion Cheers!

I'm afraid it is moot, mate, as you've introduced a straw man argument. I never claimed that penalties weren't provoked.

No I didn't. Figuratively speaking "straw man"is an insubstantial arguement my point is substantial relative to ref' penalty awards (see above). All of them are provoked. Re faz. I agreed with you. I think we agree with each other actually cheers Archie